- Original Message -
From: "Roger E. Blumberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Roger E. Blumberg"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 10:28 PM
Subject: Re: also Viola picture
> >
>
- Original Message -
From: "Roger E. Blumberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 6:27 PM
Subject: Re: also Viola picture
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "rosinfiorini&qu
- Original Message -
From: "Roger E. Blumberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 6:27 PM
Subject: Re: also Viola picture
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "rosinfiorini&qu
- Original Message -
From: "rosinfiorini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 7:59 PM
Subject: also Viola picture
>
>
> actually, i made the image paler and enlarges and it becomes apparent that
it is simply the way the bridge is drawn (its shad
- Original Message -
From: "rosinfiorini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 7:59 PM
Subject: also Viola picture
>
>
> actually, i made the image paler and enlarges and it becomes apparent that
it is simply the way the bridge is drawn (its shad
- Original Message -
From: "rosinfiorini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 7:59 PM
Subject: also Viola picture
>
>
> actually, i made the image paler and enlarges and it becomes apparent that
it is simply the way the bridge is drawn (its shad
No - not again! The story of this discovery has holes larger than loch
ness ... it's more a "could have been, if ..." than it would be based on
facts.
Thomas
Am Die, 2004-03-23 um 00.57 schrieb Roman Turovsky:
> Venere1613/Schelle1726 in Leipzig Musikinstrumenten-Museum, #3356
> (85.5x108x121cm
Please note: I moved this thread to the Baroque-Lute List where this might
profit from slightly different demographics.
RT
__
Roman M. Turovsky
http://turovsky.org
http://polyhymnion.org
I'd say differently...
On Tuesday, Mar 23, 2004, at 16:05 Europe/Warsaw, Roman Turovsky wrote:
> "Weiss" theorbo is an exception.
> RT
>> Now I'm confused. Didn't Stewart (and others) identify a theorbo as
>> a lute
>> with re-entrant tunings? So if one avoids re-entrant tunings, is it
>> sti
Tim wrote:
>
> Now I'm confused. Didn't Stewart (and others) identify a theorbo as a lute
> with re-entrant tunings? So if one avoids re-entrant tunings, is it still a
> theorbo?
I've just started reading Nigel North's continuo book and in the first chapter he
lists several tunings for theorbo
> theorbo?
>
> Tim Kuntz
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Roman Turovsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "David Rastall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "LUTE-LIST" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 9:38 PM
>
" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "LUTE-LIST" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 9:38 PM
Subject: Re: also
> > I'm just curious: why is it without the first string? Is it just that
> > the chanterelle can't sustain that playing length?
>
Roman,
You are completly unreachable to me at both your known addresses. Will
you please ask both the @verizon.net and @att.net if one can ever
communicate with you from @poczta.wp.pl. I wouldn't like to bother this
forum with such problems any more, so lets find answer on both sides...
To your
Alain, et al.
Speaking of Weiß lutes, the National Music Museum has just posted very
nice studies of two of their most recently-purchased lutes: one a
13-course apparently made by Thomas Edlinger (who made some of Weiß'
instruments), and the other an earlier Italian instrument modified into a
13-c
> I'm just curious: why is it without the first string? Is it just that
> the chanterelle can't sustain that playing length?
Yes, and to avoid re-entrant tunings.
RT
>
>> A large (80cm+) triple-swan-neck baroque lute sans first string.
>> It works VERY well for Bach cello suites.
>> RT
>>> What
I'm just curious: why is it without the first string? Is it just that
the chanterelle can't sustain that playing length?
David Rastall
On Monday, March 22, 2004, at 06:39 PM, Roman Turovsky wrote:
> A large (80cm+) triple-swan-neck baroque lute sans first string.
> It works VERY well for Bac
Venere1613/Schelle1726 in Leipzig Musikinstrumenten-Museum, #3356
(85.5x108x121cm) is suspected to be Weiss' own axe.
RT
__
Roman M. Turovsky
http://turovsky.org
http://polyhymnion.org
> A large (80cm+) triple-swan-neck baroque lute sans first string.
> It works VERY well for Bach cello
A large (80cm+) triple-swan-neck baroque lute sans first string.
It works VERY well for Bach cello suites.
RT
> What is a "Weiss theorbo" exactly?
> Alain
>
> At 01:41 PM 3/22/04, Roman Turovsky wrote:
>> I have put another interesting photo, that of a triple-swan-neck lute from
>> Deutsches Museu
I'm not sure if this question will be answered, but the LSA is about to=20
send the next Journal to the printers and I'm told it will be all about the=
=20
instruments Weiss used in his music. It's the 2nd of what will be a series=
=20
of 4-5 Journals all about Weiss.
Nancy Carlin
Lute Society of
What is a "Weiss theorbo" exactly?
Alain
At 01:41 PM 3/22/04, Roman Turovsky wrote:
>I have put another interesting photo, that of a triple-swan-neck lute from
>Deutsches Museum in München, on
>http://polyhymnion.org/swv/vita.html
>RT
20 matches
Mail list logo
