Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu,carlos flores [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re:Jon
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 02:16:37 -0500
Carlos,
I agree entirely - I misspoke. Music is defined within one's self. My
intent
was merely to describe the transmission process from an external source
hi Jon, i tried several times to post this Re. to your
message but it came up messed with things and numbers.
a try one last time-for whatever it is worth-haha:)
Whatever I can show on the sillyscope or prove as to the effects of
spinning bodies or conical strings on the actual tone production
Whatever I can show on the sillyscope or prove as to the effects of
spinning bodies or conical strings on the actual tone production there is
only one instrument that can define music. The human ear,
in my case its more the Heart that defines music, but it
doesnt matter : big world, different
Carlos,
I agree entirely - I misspoke. Music is defined within one's self. My intent
was merely to describe the transmission process from an external source, and
it was triggered by R's tongue in cheek speculation on conical strings. I
should have said that the ear defines what we physically
