l the Best,
Gary
- Original Message -
From: Eugene Braig
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 11:34:14 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: re: who's zooming who? (READER ALERT: POLITICAL CONTENT)
> At 08:06 PM 06/22/2004 -0500, Gary Digman wrote:
At 08:06 PM 06/22/2004 -0500, Gary Digman wrote:
> To those that are offended by political discussion, I would say
>political discussion is a necessary evil in a democratic society. It
>may not be fun, but is is necessary. Also, I value freedom, and
>freedom means b
Bill, and all,
I am not one to be objecting to "non lute" postings, but I have read this
thread - so answer to all rather than one.
Around the world there are biases in coverage of events - and also over
time. There were polemics written in the 13 colonies about the arguments
over our Constitutio
al Message -
From: bill
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 23:41:19 +0200
To: lute society
Subject: re: who's zooming who?
> what this is about is a silence that says it all and some
psychopaths
> making videos of some other psychopaths beheading some hapless
am
;bill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "lute society" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 11:30 AM
Subject: who's zooming who?
> can we assume that those of us on the list who were morally outraged by
> a photograph have been rendered speechless by a video o
what this is about is a silence that says it all and some psychopaths
making videos of some other psychopaths beheading some hapless american
sponsored members of the coalition in iraq.
when photographs of american soldiers humiliating iraqi detainees were
released to the general public, the lu
TECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 9:00 PM
> Subject: Re: Re: who's zooming who?
>
>
> > Ok, I've been at work all day so catch me up. What are you guys talking
> about?
> >
> > Craig
> >
> > Sean wrote:
&
I agree with Craig. What are we talking about? That would help in knowing
whether to ignore it or not.
Tony
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 9:00 PM
Subject: Re: Re: who's zooming who?
> Ok, I
Moral outrage, ranting, speechlessness. Oh, great. This should make for some
interesting lute stories. I can't wait.
-d
--
At 03:00 PM 06/22/2004 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Ok, I've been at work all day so catch me up. What are you guys talking about?
I've been at work and away from television all day too. I, on the other
hand, hope to only read about lutes via this list. There's plenty of space
for fuming
Ok, I've been at work all day so catch me up. What are you guys talking about?
Craig
Sean wrote:
>
> bill,
>
> Perhaps we are adhering to the idea of the lutenet for the lute's sake. For
> my own part, yes, I am paying attention and am outraged at that and more. I
> hope it's appreciated by o
bill,
Perhaps we are adhering to the idea of the lutenet for the lute's sake. For
my own part, yes, I am paying attention and am outraged at that and more. I
hope it's appreciated by other listers that I do my ranting "up close and
personal" in my own neighborhood, work and social circles.
Se
can we assume that those of us on the list who were morally outraged by
a photograph have been rendered speechless by a video or are we resting
our condemnation between courts martial?
- bill
13 matches
Mail list logo
