Re: [lvs-users] LVS & Reverse Proxy Squid

2007-09-19 Thread Brad Taylor
Right now I'm only using one Squid in the test environment. When the IP is added to the squid config file I see that LVS is able to add the server to the pool but when I go to the VIP in a browser I see that LVS only sees the connection as inactive. When I remove the IP in the squid config file eve

[lvs-users] LVS-NAT simple (?) setup not working in mysterious way?

2007-09-19 Thread Steve Wray
Hi there, I've spent the last few days reading and re-reading LVS documentation, doing network traces etc and trying to figure out what is going wrong here. I am trying to set up a simple 2-network LVS-NAT to a webserver. So far as I can tell all of my config is by the book. I've stripped it

Re: [lvs-users] LVS-NAT simple (?) setup not working in mysterious way?

2007-09-19 Thread Joseph Mack NA3T
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, Steve Wray wrote: > I am trying to set up a simple 2-network LVS-NAT to a webserver. > > So far as I can tell all of my config is by the book. > > I've stripped it down to one DIP, one RIP. > > In the end there is intended to be two directors with failover so the config > sho

Re: [lvs-users] LVS-NAT simple (?) setup not working in mysterious way?

2007-09-19 Thread Steve Wray
Joseph Mack NA3T wrote: > On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, Steve Wray wrote: > > >> I am trying to set up a simple 2-network LVS-NAT to a webserver. >> >> So far as I can tell all of my config is by the book. >> >> I've stripped it down to one DIP, one RIP. >> >> In the end there is intended to be two direc

Re: [lvs-users] LVS-NAT simple (?) setup not working in mysterious way?

2007-09-19 Thread Joseph Mack NA3T
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, Steve Wray wrote: > Joseph Mack NA3T wrote: >> On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, Steve Wray wrote: >> >> >>> I am trying to set up a simple 2-network LVS-NAT to a webserver. >>> >>> So far as I can tell all of my config is by the book. >>> >>> I've stripped it down to one DIP, one RIP. >>>

Re: [lvs-users] LVS-NAT simple (?) setup not working in mysterious way?

2007-09-19 Thread Steve Wray
Joseph Mack NA3T wrote: > On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, Steve Wray wrote: > > > > there's no point in looking through tcpdumps for an LVS that > isn't set up correctly. > > Look this is very frustrating, I have been through the documentation repeatedly this week and tried to follow it as closely a

Re: [lvs-users] LVS-NAT simple (?) setup not working in mysterious way?

2007-09-19 Thread Steve Wray
Look at this and tell me if this isn't a nice, simple case of LVS-NAT. Please. Is there something that I am not seeing? I've stared at this and at the documentation and howtos for so long now I can't see straight. The traffic *appears* to come into the client from the VIP but the client does no

[lvs-users] keepalived: SSH getting "No route to host"

2007-09-19 Thread Gerry Reno
I have setup a stanza in keepalived.conf for SSH to use an alternate port. But whenever I try to ssh into the VIP on the alternate port I get a "No route to host". It looks like it gets to the director but it never gets to the real server. I see an immediate inactive connection in IPVS. All

Re: [lvs-users] keepalived: SSH getting "No route to host"

2007-09-19 Thread Gerry Reno
Gerry Reno wrote: > I have setup a stanza in keepalived.conf for SSH to use an alternate > port. But whenever I try to ssh into the VIP on the alternate port I > get a "No route to host". It looks like it gets to the director but it > never gets to the real server. I see an immediate inactive