Re: [lvs-users] ldirectord feature patch - add abilility to signal system maintenance

2009-05-19 Thread Christian Balzer
Hello Simon, On Tue, 19 May 2009 19:52:42 +1000 Simon Horman wrote: > On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 04:27:19PM +0900, Christian Balzer wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > On Sat, 16 May 2009 02:24:55 +1000 Simon Horman wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 09:19 -0400, Geoff Harrison wrote: > > > > Isn't

Re: [lvs-users] ldirectord http monitoring

2009-05-19 Thread Simon Horman
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 07:00:44PM +, Daniel Lemay wrote: > Hi, > > I have a service like the following: > > virtual=x.x.x.x: >real=192.168.58.1: masq >real=192.168.58.2: masq >service=http >request="index.html" >receive="Test page" >scheduler=rr >proto

[lvs-users] ldirectord http monitoring

2009-05-19 Thread Daniel Lemay
Hi, I have a service like the following: virtual=x.x.x.x: real=192.168.58.1: masq real=192.168.58.2: masq service=http request="index.html" receive="Test page" scheduler=rr protocol=tcp The url I want to monitor is: http://example1:/index.html The following

Re: [lvs-users] ldirectord feature patch - add abilility tosignalsystem maintenance

2009-05-19 Thread Simon Horman
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 06:59:55AM -0700, Robinson, Eric wrote: > I can verify that it is behaving as I described on my Centos 5.2 system > running heartbeat-ldirectord-2.1.3-3.el5.centos and it did the same > thing with an earlier verson of ldirectord, thought I don't recall the > version number a

Re: [lvs-users] ldirectord feature patch - add abilility to signal system maintenance

2009-05-19 Thread Simon Horman
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 04:27:19PM +0900, Christian Balzer wrote: > > Hello, > > On Sat, 16 May 2009 02:24:55 +1000 Simon Horman wrote: > > > On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 09:19 -0400, Geoff Harrison wrote: > > > Isn't that what quiescent=yes is for? At least in masquerade mode > > > (what we use), wh

Re: [lvs-users] ldirectord feature patch - add abilility to signal system maintenance

2009-05-19 Thread Christian Balzer
Hello, On Sat, 16 May 2009 02:24:55 +1000 Simon Horman wrote: > > On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 09:19 -0400, Geoff Harrison wrote: > > Isn't that what quiescent=yes is for? At least in masquerade mode > > (what we use), when the weight is set to 0 ipvs continues to send > > existing TCP sessions to th