Re: [lvs-users] LVS-NAT issue with bnx2 (Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5709)

2012-09-10 Thread daryl herzmann
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012, Graeme Fowler wrote: > On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 08:26 -0500, daryl herzmann wrote: >> Any ideas? > > Most commonly in recent months is the suggestion to turn off receive > offloads: > > ethtool -K eth0 gro off Wow, amazing. That resolved the issue I was seeing! daryl

Re: [lvs-users] LVS-NAT issue with bnx2 (Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5709)

2012-09-10 Thread Graeme Fowler
On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 08:26 -0500, daryl herzmann wrote: > Any ideas? Most commonly in recent months is the suggestion to turn off receive offloads: ethtool -K eth0 gro off Graeme ___ Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:

[lvs-users] LVS-NAT issue with bnx2 (Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5709)

2012-09-10 Thread daryl herzmann
Greetings, I've been a happy LVS-NAT user for many years now. I am hoping to migrate to newer hardware, but have been having issues getting LVS-NAT to work with a Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5709 card. The symptom is very poor network performance. Traffic is able to pass through the NAT, but it

Re: [lvs-users] LVS-NAT issue

2007-07-11 Thread Kees Hoekzema
> -Original Message- > The problem is as folows: the setup works randomly, fron 15 > mins to 1-2 hours, flawlessly, i might add, serving content > from both backend machines. However, it randomly stops doing > that. When that happens, i cannot ping the VIP from the > outside, only fr

Re: [lvs-users] LVS-NAT issue

2007-07-11 Thread Cristi
Cristi wrote: > Joseph Mack NA3T wrote: > >> On Mon, 9 Jul 2007, Cristi wrote: >> >> >> >>> Joseph Mack NA3T wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, 8 Jul 2007, Cristi wrote: > Hello again, > > I installed heartbeat an ran into some trouble

Re: [lvs-users] LVS-NAT issue

2007-07-08 Thread Cristi
Joseph Mack NA3T wrote: > On Mon, 9 Jul 2007, Cristi wrote: > > >> Joseph Mack NA3T wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 8 Jul 2007, Cristi wrote: >>> >>> >>> Hello again, I installed heartbeat an ran into some trouble. I run 2 services on the 2 real servers : httpd using LVS-NA

Re: [lvs-users] LVS-NAT issue

2007-07-08 Thread Joseph Mack NA3T
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007, Cristi wrote: > Joseph Mack NA3T wrote: >> On Sun, 8 Jul 2007, Cristi wrote: >> >> >>> Hello again, >>> >>> I installed heartbeat an ran into some trouble. I run 2 services on the >>> 2 real servers : httpd using LVS-NAT and sql using DR. >>> >> >> did you handle the different

Re: [lvs-users] LVS-NAT issue

2007-07-08 Thread Cristi
Joseph Mack NA3T wrote: > On Sun, 8 Jul 2007, Cristi wrote: > > >> Hello again, >> >> I installed heartbeat an ran into some trouble. I run 2 services on the >> 2 real servers : httpd using LVS-NAT and sql using DR. >> > > did you handle the different default gw requirements for > the two

Re: [lvs-users] LVS-NAT issue

2007-07-08 Thread Joseph Mack NA3T
On Sun, 8 Jul 2007, Cristi wrote: > Hello again, > > I installed heartbeat an ran into some trouble. I run 2 services on the > 2 real servers : httpd using LVS-NAT and sql using DR. did you handle the different default gw requirements for the two forwarders? > I rely onto > hearbeat to do the N

Re: [lvs-users] LVS-NAT issue

2007-07-08 Thread Cristi
In addition to that, the initial problem resurfaced, I.E. the VIP stopped responding to icmp even though it shows up as secondary on a "ip add sh" on eth0. The 4 machines are newly installed, with no alterations or patches whatsoever. Also, the only alias set on lo:0 on the real servers si the

Re: [lvs-users] LVS-NAT issue

2007-07-08 Thread Cristi
Hello again, I installed heartbeat an ran into some trouble. I run 2 services on the 2 real servers : httpd using LVS-NAT and sql using DR. I rely onto hearbeat to do the NAT part, but it doesn't seem to work. I setup the nat manually like so: ipvsadm -A -t PUBLIC_VIP:www -s rr ipvsadm -a -t P

Re: [lvs-users] LVS-NAT issue

2007-07-07 Thread Graeme Fowler
On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 17:30 +0300, Cristi wrote: > Thank you, Graeme, for the input. But wont's that prevent me from using > heartbeat as i plan to get a HA-LB . No, it won't. > p.s. The setup consists of 4 Centos 5 machines, with k 2.6.18 adn > ipsvadm/hearbeat will be instaled from centos rep

Re: [lvs-users] LVS-NAT issue

2007-07-06 Thread Cristi
Graeme Fowler wrote: > On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 13:59 +0300, Cristi wrote: > >> VIP set as lo:0 alias on both real servers. >> > > You don't need this for NAT. Remove it and you will, in all likelihood, > find that your problem goes away. > > Graeme > > > __

Re: [lvs-users] LVS-NAT issue

2007-07-06 Thread Graeme Fowler
On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 13:59 +0300, Cristi wrote: > VIP set as lo:0 alias on both real servers. You don't need this for NAT. Remove it and you will, in all likelihood, find that your problem goes away. Graeme ___ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - l

[lvs-users] LVS-NAT issue

2007-07-06 Thread Cristi
Hello, I am having some issues with my LVS-NAT. Topology is as follows: Director eth0- public address :100-VIP - public- eth1: 192.168.100.2, default GW for real servers VIP set as lo:0 alias on both real servers. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ipvsadm