Re: [lvs-users] active-active by a multipath routes

On Fri, 2008-05-09 at 12:06 +0300, Siim Põder wrote: > Is anyone running active-active(-active...) LVS setups? I'm not (yet) but I may be doing so sometime this year. Current thinking is (per your email) to run Quagga, Zebra, or ospfd (or something else) on the directors themselves which will anno

Re: [lvs-users] active-active by a multipath routes

On Fri, 9 May 2008, Siim P?der wrote: Hi! Is anyone running active-active(-active...) LVS setups? Is it saru or something else? saru was a proof of principle piece of code by Horms a few years ago. It was done for one kernel and has not been maintained through the subsequent kernels. It'

[lvs-users] active-active by a multipath routes

Hi! Is anyone running active-active(-active...) LVS setups? Is it saru or something else? It's seems it should be possible to do it without saru by having multipath route-capable router upstream dividing the traffic between all the directors. If you can manage the routes with OSPF, it should be p