[lvs-users] where is connection?

2007-08-02 Thread Gerry Reno
I went and established a ssh connection to my VIP and I also started a web session to my VIP but when I look for connections on MASTER I do not see them. Instead I see connections on BACKUP. Here is some output: MASTER: [EMAIL PROTECTED] keepalived]# ipvsadm -l IP Virtual Server version 1.2.1

Re: [lvs-users] where is connection?

2007-08-02 Thread Gerry Reno
Gerry Reno wrote: > I went and established a ssh connection to my VIP and I also started a > web session to my VIP but when I look for connections on MASTER I do not > see them. Instead I see connections on BACKUP. Here is some output: > > MASTER: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] keepalived]# ipvsadm -l > I

Re: [lvs-users] where is connection?

2007-08-02 Thread Gerry Reno
Gerry Reno wrote: > I went and established a ssh connection to my VIP and I also started a > web session to my VIP but when I look for connections on MASTER I do not > see them. Instead I see connections on BACKUP. Here is some output: > > MASTER: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] keepalived]# ipvsadm -l > I

Re: [lvs-users] where is connection?

2007-08-02 Thread Gerry Reno
Gerry Reno wrote: > So I wait for a while and let all connections go inactive/timeout then I > reload webpage to VIP and make new connection using ssh to VIP and now > it is showing on MASTER. Not one new entry in logs on either server. So > how can this be? > MASTER: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] keepaliv

Re: [lvs-users] where is connection?

2007-08-02 Thread Gerry Reno
Gerry Reno wrote: > Gerry Reno wrote: > >> So I wait for a while and let all connections go inactive/timeout then I >> reload webpage to VIP and make new connection using ssh to VIP and now >> it is showing on MASTER. Not one new entry in logs on either server. So >> how can this be? >> MASTER

Re: [lvs-users] where is connection?

2007-08-02 Thread Graeme Fowler
Gerry On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 14:49 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote: > I would like to know how to make LVS reliable even when taking servers > down for maintenance. I think you need to back up a bit and take stock. Firstly, keepalived is not LVS. It's a combined VRRP implementation, healthcheck subsyste

Re: [lvs-users] where is connection?

2007-08-02 Thread Graeme Fowler
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 20:26 +0100, Graeme Fowler wrote: > For now, that'll do. We'll move onto LVS when you have keepalived/VRRP > behaving as you want it to. also remind us what topology this is - NAT or DR? Graeme ___ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing

Re: [lvs-users] where is connection?

2007-08-02 Thread Gerry Reno
Graeme Fowler wrote: > Gerry > > On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 14:49 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote: >> I would like to know how to make LVS reliable even when taking servers >> down for maintenance. > > I think you need to back up a bit and take stock. > > Firstly, keepalived is not LVS. It's a combined VRRP im

Re: [lvs-users] where is connection?

2007-08-02 Thread Graeme Fowler
Hi Gerry On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 16:24 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote: > This is all LVS-DR and I admit I am no network expert. But I do think I > understand the basic concepts of how LVS functions. So here goes at some > basic information of my setup: > > FIREWALLS: both MASTER and BACKUP are identical

Re: [lvs-users] where is connection?

2007-08-02 Thread Gerry Reno
Forgot this: ROUTING TABLE: shows same on MASTER, BACKUP and all RS [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# route Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 192.168.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 169.254.0.0 * 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 default 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0

Re: [lvs-users] where is connection?

2007-08-02 Thread Gerry Reno
Graeme Fowler wrote: > Hi Gerry > > On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 16:24 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote: > >> This is all LVS-DR and I admit I am no network expert. But I do think I >> understand the basic concepts of how LVS functions. So here goes at some >> basic information of my setup: >> >> FIREWALLS: b

Re: [lvs-users] where is connection?

2007-08-02 Thread Gerry Reno
Gerry Reno wrote: > The rest of this setup is working fine except that you cannot reliably > tell where the connections are. > And you have to restart both directors not just one in order to get reliable connections. Gerry ___ LinuxVirtualServer

Re: [lvs-users] where is connection?

2007-08-02 Thread Graeme Fowler
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 17:10 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote: > No. Directors and Real Servers are separate machines. Right, got that, In that case once the realservers are setup, just leave them alone. Their config is the same regardless of the active director. > While working through the HOWTO it explai

Re: [lvs-users] where is connection?

2007-08-02 Thread Graeme Fowler
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 17:18 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote: > And you have to restart both directors not just one in order to get > reliable connections. See my closing comments on the reply to your previous message. Graeme ___ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailin

Re: [lvs-users] where is connection?

2007-08-02 Thread Gerry Reno
Graeme Fowler wrote: > On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 17:10 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote: > >> No. Directors and Real Servers are separate machines. >> > > Right, got that, In that case once the realservers are setup, just leave > them alone. Their config is the same regardless of the active director. >

Re: [lvs-users] where is connection?

2007-08-02 Thread Joseph Mack NA3T
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Gerry Reno wrote: Gerry, You had about 80 lines posted above from 3 levels of posting. If some of this is not needed for this question, can you edit it out? >> Because the client has ended the TCP connection. Remember: *blink*. >> > So they would not even be shown a

Re: [lvs-users] where is connection?

2007-08-02 Thread Joseph Mack NA3T
On Fri, 3 Aug 2007, Graeme Fowler wrote: > It won't hurt you to ping the router (the RS default gateway) from the > VIP on transition, even if the router does handle GARP. At least you'll > know that it knows, IYSWIM. > > ping -c3 -I $VIP $GW send_arp.c (mentioned in the HOWTO) does the same thin

Re: [lvs-users] where is connection?

2007-08-02 Thread Graeme Fowler
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 17:43 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote: > So they would not even be shown as InActConn, right? No. Closed connections are neither active nor inactive, they're closed. For LVS-NAT the director sees the whole transaction, so it knows that a connection has been opened/is active/is closi

Re: [lvs-users] where is connection?

2007-08-02 Thread Gerry Reno
Joseph Mack NA3T wrote: > If some of this is not needed for this question, > can you edit it out? > Sure thing. Gerry ___ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@LinuxVirtualServer.org Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or go to http://list

Re: [lvs-users] where is connection?

2007-08-02 Thread Gerry Reno
Graeme Fowler wrote: > ping -c3 -I $VIP $GW > This command hangs for me unless I add -w 3 to deadline it. Also, F7 is giving an avc denial when I try to run it in a notify script. Darn SELinux; I like it until it does this type of thing. I opened a bug on F7 for this. Something about denied a

Re: [lvs-users] where is connection?

2007-08-02 Thread Gerry Reno
Here is a scenario that is presenting inconsistent results: Both directors started and running normally handling VIP connections. Users have been working in webapps but they are idle for a while and connections have gone past persistent time. ipvsadm -l on both directors shows no connections. (t

Re: [lvs-users] where is connection?

2007-08-03 Thread Graeme Fowler
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 21:35 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote: > Graeme Fowler wrote: > > ping -c3 -I $VIP $GW > > > This command hangs for me unless I add -w 3 to deadline it. That sounds like your router is dropping ICMP from your directors, then. I'd expect it to take 3 seconds to return, like so: [E

Re: [lvs-users] where is connection?

2007-08-03 Thread Gerry Reno
Graeme Fowler wrote: > On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 21:35 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote: > >> Also, F7 is giving an avc denial when I try to run it in a notify >> script. Darn SELinux; I like it until it does this type of thing. I >> opened a bug on F7 for this. Something about denied access to ip socket.