Re: [lwip-users] memp_malloc system protection

Mike Kleshov wrote: 2009/11/27 goldsi...@gmx.de : Yes, you should. That's what's SYS_LIGHTWEIGHT_PROT is meant to be for. Simon Surely it depends on the application. I'm using lwip raw API with no OS. I'm not using any concurrent access protection whatsoever. My interrupt service rout

Re: [lwip-users] memp_malloc system protection

2009/11/27 goldsi...@gmx.de : > Yes, you should. That's what's SYS_LIGHTWEIGHT_PROT is meant to be for. > > Simon Surely it depends on the application. I'm using lwip raw API with no OS. I'm not using any concurrent access protection whatsoever. My interrupt service routines are small and simple,

Re: [lwip-users] memp_malloc system protection

Francois Bouchard wrote: I'm running lwIP in stand alone mode and I'm wondering if I should mask interrupts routines during buffer allocation? memp_malloc() Yes, you should. That's what's SYS_LIGHTWEIGHT_PROT is meant to be for. Simon ___ lwip-user

[lwip-users] memp_malloc system protection

I'm running lwIP in stand alone mode and I'm wondering if I should mask interrupts routines during buffer allocation? memp_malloc() THx Francois___ lwip-users mailing list lwip-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users