[lwip-users] mem alignment issue when updating to Rev 1.4.1

Hi When updating lwip from 1.3.2 to 1.4.1 I see some asserts checking for alignment equal 4. They are hard coded. Does this mean lwip can only be used with MEM_ALIGNMENT equal 4 from this Release on? Regards Thomas ___ lwip-users mailing list

Re: [lwip-users] Split DNS for multihomed setup

Thanks for the input! I'll try to provide a concrete example. The device has two network interfaces. One of them (X) is physically connected to a network of organization A, another (Y) - to a network of organization B. Since those networks are completely out of our control, we can not discount

Re: [lwip-users] Split DNS for multihomed setup

Hi Mark, I understand the picture now, including your examples. You have two completely uncoordinated networks, and you need to connect them together. Not only can you have name conflicts, you can also have address conflicts. My advice -- don't do it. Not just because the configuration is wrong

Re: [lwip-users] mem alignment issue when updating to Rev 1.4.1

tm...@web.de wrote: When updating lwip from 1.3.2 to 1.4.1 I see some asserts checking for alignment equal 4. They are hard coded. Does this mean lwip can only be used with MEM_ALIGNMENT equal 4 from this Release on? No. You might get a more detailed answer by telling us exactly which

Re: [lwip-users] Simulatng an Arduino interface

Alain Mouette wrote: Hi, I have do do something a little odd, and I would like to have your advice about it and to know if anyone has ever seen anything like it I need to simulate the interface available on the Arduino (with the WizChip), I believe that wiht such an interface I could use some

Re: [lwip-users] Split DNS for multihomed setup

Having read that, I'm not sure lwip is the right stack to do that. Its simply not meant for such a setup. And like Z wrote, even if you get it running, there's no guarantee future changes to lwip will leave your setup intact. I'd suggest to either get an OS with support for separated processes