[lwip-users] lwip process

Hi all, Warm Greetings!! I am new in LWIP usage. I like to know which header lwip will start considering whether in MAC layer headers or IP headers?? Kindly give some explanation about the process of LWIP. Many Thanks, -- View this message in context:

Re: [lwip-users] LLDP Implementation for 1.4.1

Hello All Did anyone have a look at the lldp code base? Regards Amit Ashara On Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 12:57 AM, Amit Ashara wrote: > Hello All, > > The Manifest has been updated now and the new package is available for > download. > > http://www.ti.com/lit/zip/spmc023 > >

Re: [lwip-users] Tuning UDP

> package loss is < 1%. anything above absolute zero is no good, indicating a problem in your system. I would accept that some frames might get corrupted in the wire... of course... > I thought someone had experienced same issues. lwIP problems, when properly reported, are found and fixed.

Re: [lwip-users] Tuning UDP

Hi, the return err value is always OK! No error. I am actually receiving packets and I can messure the losses because I label the packages with numbers and I see what package arrive. When I send less data, package loss is < 1%. So I think there is some buffer or memory problem. The loss is random

Re: [lwip-users] lwIP 2.0.0 released

I already did.. just need to test it now  From: Sergio R. Caprile Sent: Friday, November 11, 2016 6:05 PM To: lwip-users@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [lwip-users] lwIP 2.0.0 released > Great work. Need to find the time to move from 1.41 to 2.0 J Same here. Congrats to all the team, you guys rule!

Re: [lwip-users] lwIP 2.0.0 released

> Great work. Need to find the time to move from 1.41 to 2.0 J Same here. Congrats to all the team, you guys rule! ___ lwip-users mailing list lwip-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users

Re: [lwip-users] Tuning UDP

* @return ERR_OK if data was sent, any other err_t on error */ err_t netconn_sendto(struct netconn *conn, struct netbuf *buf, ip_addr_t *addr, u16_t port) Instead of tuning UDP, I think you should first try checking return codes to see if datagrams are being sent or what. Maybe (just maybe)