Re: [lwip-users] TCP not sending initial ACK

2009-08-28 Thread Chuck Kuecker
http://www.luminarymicro.com/products/software_updates.html You want to get the 'SW-LM3S-4905' download. I think you will need to register with the web site. LWIP is in there. I am using an older version, before they changed the name to "StellarisWare". Chuck Kuecker go

RE: [lwip-users] TCP not sending initial ACK

2009-08-27 Thread Chuck Kuecker
A | 16510 USA Phone: 814 898 5000 | Fax: 814 899-3414 www.fmctechnologies.com http://www.fmctechnologies.com/> From: lwip-users-bounces+jim.pettinato=fmcti@nongnu.org [mailto:lwip-users-bounces+jim.pettinato=fmcti@nongnu.org] On Behalf Of Chuck Kuecker Sent: Thu

RE: [lwip-users] TCP not sending initial ACK

2009-08-27 Thread Chuck Kuecker
. Start up Hyperterminal in Windows and set it to 115.2K, 8N1, and set to the virtual COM the LMI driver placed there. For me, it's COM4. It's great for troubleshooting; I just wish I would have known about it earlier. --- On Thu, 8/27/09, Chuck Kuecker wrote: From: Chuck Kuecker

RE: [lwip-users] TCP not sending initial ACK

2009-08-27 Thread Chuck Kuecker
wer of 2. Often, on my streaming connection, I'll get some amount of data per packet that is about 700 bytes. --- On Thu, 8/27/09, Chuck Kuecker wrote: From: Chuck Kuecker Subject: RE: [lwip-users] TCP not sending initial ACK To: "Mailing list for lwIP users" Date: Thursday, A

RE: [lwip-users] TCP not sending initial ACK

2009-08-27 Thread Chuck Kuecker
s ok. In my case, things were ok then communications completely broke down. At any rate, I wish you luck. --- On Wed, 8/26/09, Chuck Kuecker wrote: From: Chuck Kuecker Subject: RE: [lwip-users] TCP not sending initial ACK To: "Mailing list for lwIP users" Date: Wednesday, August

RE: [lwip-users] TCP not sending initial ACK

2009-08-27 Thread Chuck Kuecker
pletely broke down. At any rate, I wish you luck. --- On Wed, 8/26/09, Chuck Kuecker wrote: From: Chuck Kuecker Subject: RE: [lwip-users] TCP not sending initial ACK To: "Mailing list for lwIP users" Date: Wednesday, August 26, 2009, 4:02 PM Premature celebration. I changed the

RE: [lwip-users] TCP not sending initial ACK

2009-08-26 Thread Chuck Kuecker
If there's a gap in the sequence, that means Wireshark isn't displaying a packet that was sent, either because your hardware or OS discarded it. I haven't tried half-duplex yet with the hub again. I'm assuming this would also fix your problem. --- On Wed, 8/26/09, Chuck Kue

RE: [lwip-users] TCP not sending initial ACK

2009-08-26 Thread Chuck Kuecker
ap in the sequence, that means Wireshark isn't displaying a packet that was sent, either because your hardware or OS discarded it. I haven't tried half-duplex yet with the hub again. I'm assuming this would also fix your problem. --- On Wed, 8/26/09, Chuck Kuecker wrote: From: Chu

RE: [lwip-users] TCP not sending initial ACK

2009-08-26 Thread Chuck Kuecker
+ckuecker=chaney-inst@nongnu.org [mailto:lwip-users-bounces+ckuecker=chaney-inst@nongnu.org] On Behalf Of goldsi...@gmx.de Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 10:34 AM To: Mailing list for lwIP users Subject: Re: [lwip-users] TCP not sending initial ACK Chuck Kuecker wrote: > > I've tri

[lwip-users] TCP not sending initial ACK

2009-08-26 Thread Chuck Kuecker
blem. Other TCP exchanges work fine, with the same code structure in the two callback functions. Any ideas? Chuck Kuecker ___ lwip-users mailing list lwip-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users

RE: [lwip-users] DNS question

2009-08-14 Thread Chuck Kuecker
enue | Erie PA | 16510 USA Phone: 814 898 5000 | Fax: 814 899-3414 www.fmctechnologies.com -Original Message- From: lwip-users-bounces+jim.pettinato=fmcti@nongnu.org [mailto:lwip-users-bounces+jim.pettinato=fmcti@nongnu.org] On Behalf Of Chuck Kuecker Sent: Friday, August 14, 20

RE: [lwip-users] DNS question

2009-08-14 Thread Chuck Kuecker
unces+ckuecker=chaney-inst@nongnu.org] On Behalf Of Kieran Mansley Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 10:41 AM To: Mailing list for lwIP users Subject: RE: [lwip-users] DNS question On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 10:20 -0500, Chuck Kuecker wrote: > Hi, Kieran, > > My impression was that dns_gethost

RE: [lwip-users] DNS question

2009-08-14 Thread Chuck Kuecker
users] DNS question On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 10:20 -0500, Chuck Kuecker wrote: > Hi, Kieran, > > My impression was that dns_gethostbyname() would return ERR_OK if it did > not encounter anything fatal, but would actually set up the DNS query > for transmission in the background,

RE: [lwip-users] DNS question

2009-08-14 Thread Chuck Kuecker
15 AM To: Mailing list for lwIP users Subject: Re: [lwip-users] DNS question On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 08:31 -0500, Chuck Kuecker wrote: > I have a need to know if a DNS resolution was successful. I have not > found any means by which I can tell if a callback function from > dns_gethostbyn

[lwip-users] DNS question

2009-08-14 Thread Chuck Kuecker
- dns_table_entry.err - that could possibly be set to a useful value, but I find no description of what these values represent, and I see no clean way to access the structure in question. Is there an easy way to get this information? Thanks in advance, Chuck Kuecker

[lwip-users] Email test

2009-08-14 Thread Chuck Kuecker
Just checking... ___ lwip-users mailing list lwip-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users