he suggestion. :-)
Bob
_____
Robert Curtiss
Control Systems ManagerBalfour Beatty Rail, a division of Balfour Beatty US
845-688-1502 rcurt...@balfourbeattyus.com
205 W Dewey St, Goldsboro, NC 27530
-Original Message-
From: lwip-us
rldefense.com/v3/__http://contrib-2.1.0.zip__;!!GW_tK9tuM96ueW3v!gSRUmA8Qpg8k30x6dO3ad22-SKpjR9sa5rCxU87u4ymCLLq28_jTkC978tccUeA00MLCeQ$
' from the savannah download section. You'll find the Linux and Windows 'arch'
ports there.
Any suggestions?
Bob
___
d through our email thread but I can't find where you suggested that.
Where can I find the 'master' git branch?
Tschüss,
Bob
_____
Robert Curtiss
Control Systems ManagerBalfour Beatty Rail, a division of Balfo
Simon,
I downloaded the file 'lwip-2.1.2.zip' from this page:
http://download.savannah.nongnu.org/releases/lwip/
I could not find an 'arch' or 'priv' directory in that archive.
Bob
_____
Robert Curtiss
Cont
27;priv' anywhere in the 'src' directory.
Are these required for a bare metal build? If so, where can I find them; if
not, how can I get around this?
Thanks,
Bob
_
Robert Curtiss
-Original Message-
From: lwip-users
Greetings lwIP users. I'm an experienced embedded systems developer but a
complete newbie to lwIP, and I have a newbie question.
Background:
I've inherited a project into which I want to incorporate lwIP in order to add
TCP/IP. The application is bare metal, based on the STM32F407, on a
custom-
ret_err = tcp_write(tpcb, tcpOut, len, 1);
if (ret_err)
len = 0;
}
return ret_err;
}
Regards,
Robert Applebee
Software Project Engineer
Astronics Test Systems Inc.,
4 Goodyear
Irvine, California 92618 USA
O: +1.949.460.6795
E: robert.apple...@astronics.com<mailto:robert.apple
_pcb * pcb, void *,uint16_t len,
uint8_t flags);
systemcalls.S:
.global SAPI_tcp_write
SAPI_tcp_write:
svc #22
bx lr
The latter function could also be done with a compiler inline.
You can use this technique to safely access any lwIP function from main().
- Robert
On Sat, Sep 24,
wrote:
> Robert Deschambault wrote:
>
>> I just read about this protocol and I was wondering what is involved in
>> implementing it using lwIP on an embedded target?
>>
>
> Implementing it is not really an lwIP thing: the protocol itself runs
> below what lwIP cares for,
Hello all,
I just read about this protocol and I was wondering what is involved in
implementing it using lwIP on an embedded target?
Thanks,
Bob
--
Bob Deschambault
6614 Astro Court, Mississauga
Ontario, Canada L5N 7J2
home: 905 824 7159
cell: 416 457 7163
twitter: @rdeschambault
1Fm3QkinyqiMbp
Please describe your system and software. Are you using an RTOS?
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 11:11 PM, Abhijith N M <
abhijith.m...@quest-global.com> wrote:
> Hello Team,
>
> LWIP TCP/IP stack doesn't work. lwip_socket() does not create a socket.
> Please come up with your suggestions.
>
> Thanks an
Hi,
I don't think that using the raw api is recommended in a threaded
environment since the lwIP core is not thread safe. The better approach is
to use the netconn or socket api and there are many examples of how to set
this up with freertos and an stm32f4.
We have done multithreaded application
It is hard to make a judgement without seeing your code. In my own personal
experience one no-no is to make sure that the UDP sockets are not shared. I
have had no problem running multiple different UDP services in their own
threads using different netconn connections.
_
will get a new IP address assigned by the DHCP server (dhcp offer) and
> abandon the autoip self-configured address.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* lwip-users-bounces+zsmith=campbellsci@nongnu.org [mailto:
> lwip-users-bounces+zsmith=campbellsci@nongnu.org] *On Behalf Of *Robert
>
Need some additional advice. If I have a target with an autoip assigned IP
address what should happen when a DHCP server becomes available? Should it
be doing a DHCP offer in response to the DHCP discover request from the
client?
--
Bob Deschambault
_
boot jumps
to main or main jumps to boot. But I think you have the right idea, I just
have to implement it better.
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Robert Deschambault <
robert.deschamba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for reminding me of the automatic increment of the IP address. I
>
Thanks for reminding me of the automatic increment of the IP address. I
was reviewing the code from v1.4.1 and the master branch and we are using
v1.3.2. I noticed that the newer code base no longer increments the IP
address. I had updated the code in the boot loader not to increment but
had for
Ok, now that I have autoip working, I need some advice on how to use this
feature properly. Right now, I can see my target self assign a local link
address. I tried some experiments to see how autoip behaves.
1. I tried unplugging my Ethernet cable from the switch and I see the
target self assig
Interesting solution. Does this work with AUTOIP enabled, or is it meant
to be a standalone AUTOIP-lite implementation?
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Adam Fullerton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I had issues with this too. This is what I did and it has worked with out
> change from lwIP V1.3.2 to curren
ve to do anything.
>
>
>
> *From:* lwip-users-bounces+zsmith=campbellsci@nongnu.org [mailto:
> lwip-users-bounces+zsmith=campbellsci@nongnu.org] *On Behalf Of *Robert
> Deschambault
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 18, 2015 8:29 AM
> *To:* Mailing list for lwIP users
> *S
he IP address has been assigned. Any
comments?
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 8:28 PM, Robert Deschambault <
robert.deschamba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I did a quick test to see when the autoip state is set to stop. It looks
> like that when the IP address becomes non-zero, the DHC
Hi,
I did a quick test to see when the autoip state is set to stop. It looks
like that when the IP address becomes non-zero, the DHCP code recognizes
the assignment and makes a call to dhcp_stop() which I believe is calling
autoip_stop() function coop mode. Here is what the printf debug looks li
I have one of those!
On Jun 17, 2015 6:56 PM, "Zach Smith" wrote:
> Could be. Wouldn’t hurt to try a regular old “dumb” switch.
>
>
>
> *From:* lwip-users-bounces+zsmith=campbellsci@nongnu.org [mailto:
> lwip-users-bounces+zsmith=campbellsci@nongn
[mailto:
> lwip-users-bounces+zsmith=campbellsci@nongnu.org] *On Behalf Of *Robert
> Deschambault
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 16, 2015 7:48 AM
> *To:* Mailing list for lwIP users
> *Subject:* Re: [lwip-users] Strategy Question for DHCP
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I have
Hi,
I have been doing some additional checking using the built in debug
messages from lwip during my autoip sequence. What I have found that the
autoip moves to state 1 (probing) to state 2 (announcing). But when the IP
is assigned, it goes to state 0 (stop) and never gets to state 3 (bound).
I
Hi,
I would like to attach wireshark records to a question for the group. What
is the best method?
Thanks,
Bob
___
lwip-users mailing list
lwip-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
k capture would help.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* lwip-users-bounces+zsmith=campbellsci@nongnu.org [mailto:
>> lwip-users-bounces+zsmith=campbellsci@nongnu.org] *On Behalf Of *Robert
>> Deschambault
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 27, 2015 11:58 AM
>> *To:*
Hi,
I have tried to use the approach with no success so far. I needed to tweak
the IP address pool to be compatible with our network. I hope that isn't a
problem. In lwipopts.h I have:
// AUTOIP options
#define LWIP_AUTOIP 1
#define LWIP_DHCP_AUTOIP_COOP 1
#define LWIP_DHCP_AUTOI
Thanks for the input! I will see if it works with our system.
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Zach Smith wrote:
> Use the auto ip feature of lwip which I believe is the proper way to
> handle this situation. With this feature enabled, after a certain number of
> dhcp timeouts the device will
I would like to know what is a good approach when developing an application
for an embedded device that has it's IP address assigned by DHCP. We only
have the Ethernet link and a circuit breaker for power, no other reset
buttons are available.
We currently wait for a number of DHCP timeouts and i
Was there anything else you would like me to try? I have confirmed that I
am freeing the pbuf in our code.
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Robert Deschambault <
robert.deschamba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes we free the pbuf for that case.
>
> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 2:18 PM, g
Yes we free the pbuf for that case.
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 2:18 PM, goldsi...@gmx.de wrote:
>
> So does your netif driver correctly handle netif->input returning !=
> ERR_OK? In that case, you have to free the pbuf yourself.
>
>
> Simon
>
>
> ___
> lwi
, and it never tripped for over a day.
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Robert Deschambault <
robert.deschamba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok, the code is no longer responsive, but I don't have a way to check the
> lwip_stats counters because I can't stop the program.
breakpoint so I
can observe the stats?
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 2:19 PM, goldsi...@gmx.de wrote:
> Robert Deschambault wrote:
>
>> I have enabled LWIP_STATS and LWIP_STATS_DISPLAY. Should I enable things
>> like PBUF_DEBUG? Will I see any messages on my debug printf display? Or
&
I have enabled LWIP_STATS and LWIP_STATS_DISPLAY. Should I enable things
like PBUF_DEBUG? Will I see any messages on my debug printf display? Or
should I put a breakpoint where lwip stats error number gets incremented?
Thanks,
Bob
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 9:33 AM, Robert Deschambault
I forgot to add stats.c to my project. It compiles fine now. I will
continue our stress testing with the sources from the master branch and
report any issues.
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 4:46 AM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> Robert Deschambault wrote:
> > Sorry I am new to enabling stat
Sorry I am new to enabling stats. I get linker errors when I set
LWIP_STATS to 1, it is complaining about missing symbols. Is there a guide
somewhere on how to set up the lwipopts.h file?
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 3:58 PM, goldsi...@gmx.de wrote:
> Robert Deschambault wrote:
>
>>
First chance I get I will do the experiment you suggested. I will use the
same sources I have from the master branch. They covered commits
[338feef,ee833ea,6c3f6cf], I pulled them in February. If I get the same
result, I will pull the latest sources to see if I have the same problem.
On Mon, Ma
We have been doing some work with stress testing an application developed
for lwip on our target board. It is basically a TCP echo server, UDP echo
server, and a custom server that works much like a TCP echo service. We
connect a couple clients to our custom server and and run echo tests
occasion
I think you are out of luck, you would need an OS with threads to run
sockets.
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 1:58 AM, COOKE, Damien wrote:
> Compilation of my project stops here in init.c
>
> #if ((LWIP_SOCKET || LWIP_NETCONN) && (NO_SYS==1))
> #error "If you want to use Sequential API, you have to
Given the number of fixes and improvements I would recommend going through
the pain and try to keep any custom code out of the stock sources. I moved
our v1.3.2 code to the latest from the main branch in git.
On Mar 18, 2015 3:57 AM, "Simon Goldschmidt" wrote:
>
> Karl Karpfen wrote:
>
> So my qu
Hi all,
Just curious to find out if there is a v1.5 in our future. Seems to have
been a lot of commits recently.
Thanks,
Bob
--
Bob Deschambault
6614 Astro Court, Mississauga
Ontario, Canada L5N 7J2
___
lwip-users mailing list
lwip-users@nongnu.org
h
Thanks! Greatly appreciated.
Bob
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Sergio R. Caprile
wrote:
> $ grep -R VERSION programming/lwip/lwip
> programming/lwip/lwip/src/include/lwip/init.h:#define
> LWIP_VERSION_MAJOR 1U
> programming/lwip/lwip/src/include/lwip/init.h:#define
> LWIP_VERSION_MINOR
Hi,
Where is the best place to get lwIP version info so I can echo it back when
my app starts up?
Thanks,
Bob
___
lwip-users mailing list
lwip-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
I am very sure you are right! I will review my code to make sure I am
compliant with the lwIP threading model as you describe. I will let you
know how it goes.
Thanks!
Bob
On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Sylvain Rochet
wrote:
> Hello Robert,
>
> On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 10:18:2
Hi,
I am using the latest sources from the master branch and I am running on a
STM32F429 under CMSIS-RTOS/RTX. I am putting together a framework for our
application that includes multiple servers each running in its own thread.
I have written and tested the code for each server individually and
Hi all,
I was reviewing our old code and we had a redundant call to the
initialization code for the UDP services. Seems moving to the latest lwip
master branch sources has fixed some issues with our legacy code!
Bob
___
lwip-users mailing list
lwip
Hi all,
I have a very simple UDP server that has been implemented in our legacy
code using LwIP v1.3.2. I am moving the code to the latest code from the
lwip-master branch. There is a call to udp_bind() that returns ERR_USE in
the latest code. I am using the raw api for this application. Does
Thanks very much that did the trick!
Bob
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:25 AM, goldsi...@gmx.de wrote:
LWIP_PLATFORM_DIAG has to be defined in your cc.h, like this one from the
> win32 port (remember hat it is called with double (()) to be able to pass
> varargs without ther "newer" __VA_ARGS__):
>
Hi,
I am trying to use the latest sources from master branch in one of my
projects. I had previously been using the v1.4.1 code.
I am getting many compiler warnings that seem to be tied to:
LWIP_PLATFORM_DIAG. Here is a sample:
compiling api_lib.c...
C:\work\exp_lm_g2_cmsis-rtos\Libraries\Open
Hi all,
I notice that there have been a lot of fixes since the release of v1.4.1.
Should we be looking at the latest fixes? Is a release coming soon?
Thanks,
Bob
___
lwip-users mailing list
lwip-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listin
Hello,
I am using an STM32F407 microcontroller and I would like to use LwIP 1.4.1
with CMSIS-RTOS/RTX. I have seen examples using FreeRTOS, but I was
interested to find out if anyone has ported their sys_arch.c and sys_arch.h
to CMSIS-RTOS/RTX v4.75.
Thanks,
Bob
--
Bob Deschambault
6614 Astro
not have solved this
without your help.
Rob
On 13/11/14 16:45, Robert Wood wrote:
"GET /index.html HTTP/1.1\r\n\r\n"
Does that mean I can't use HTTP 1.1 or is it simply I have to put extra
information in the GET string?
___
lwip
information in the GET string?
Many thanks for your patience, it is much appreciated.
Rob
On 13/11/14 16:13, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
Robert Wood wrote:
Sorry, I'm obviously still not explaining this clearly.
I don't really think that this is our problem...
To get a grip on this, cou
e sort of feedback to know that ACK has gone
out?
Cheers,
Rob
On 13/11/14 14:55, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
Robert,
it would have *greatly* helped if you would have described which packets
are the ones in question. I'm assuming you mean packets 23-25
(ack_but_no_get) and 52-55 (no_ack_but
*Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 13. November 2014 um 15:04 Uhr
*Von:* "Robert Wood"
*An:* lwip-users@nongnu.org
*Betreff:* Re: [lwip-users] Pulling data from a server using HTTP with lwIP
Hopefully these two text files get attached the the mailing list. If
not, I'll send them directly.
One sends
;t think I really get what your problem is. Could you send a small
pcap the packets in question?
Simon
*Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 13. November 2014 um 14:41 Uhr
*Von:* "Robert Wood"
*An:* lwip-users@nongnu.org
*Betreff:* Re: [lwip-users] Pulling data from a server using HTTP with lwIP
Ah, n
the case that I can poll something to wait for the stack to inform me
that the ACK has gone out and I can send stuff or am I looking at it the
wrong way?
Thanks,
Rob
On 13/11/14 13:31, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
Robert,
are you aware that it's legal for the ACK you are missing to contain
da
d know when the stack has sent the ACK to the server and I am at
liberty to send the GET request?
I hope I've made that clearer. :~)
I'm probably doing naive things because I'm trying to learn a lot of
stuff at the moment!
On 13/11/14 13:09, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
Robert Wood wrot
. I'm happy to be told I'm talking nonsense
though.
Thanks!
On 13/11/14 11:21, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
Robert Wood wrote:
H. I seem to be wrong, It *does* send out the ACK. I took out these
lines:
strcpy(GetString,"GET /index.html HTTP/1.1\r\n");
netconn_write(
have to wait, in my code, for something in the lwIP stack to inform
me that the ACK went out and I can send data to the established
connection? If so, how do I do that?
If not, what I am doing wrong?
Thanks again.
On 13/11/14 09:54, Robert Wood wrote:
I'm getting started with lwIP; I have
I'm getting started with lwIP; I have the SAM7X FreeRTOS demo running
and it is serving its demo file just fine.
However, what I really need to do is pull a file *from* a server. So,
I've created a new thread and done the following:
xNetConn = netconn_new ( NETCONN_TCP );
IP4_ADDR(&local_ip,
Thanks for the links! I will check them out.
Bob
On Nov 10, 2014 7:31 AM, "Sergio R. Caprile" wrote:
> No,
> I have my own port and been compiling it with Keil on a Cortex-M3.
> I have some patches on top of 1.4.1 and didn't like the way Keil packs
> lwIP. My advice is to use lwIP with an open a
Hi,
I was curious to know if anyone is using the Keil MDK v5 tools and trying
to take advantage of the lwIP 1.4.1 software pack for building network
applications on ARM processors?
Thanks!
Bob
--
Bob Deschambault
6614 Astro Court, Mississauga
Ontario, Canada L5N 7J2
home: 905 824 7159
cell: 416
luck,
Bob
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Robert Wood
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a reasonably simple project that needs some TCP/IP functionality. I
> need to use HTTP to pull a file from a NAS and I also need to have a socket
> open (potentially at the same time the the sa
Hi all,
I have a reasonably simple project that needs some TCP/IP functionality.
I need to use HTTP to pull a file from a NAS and I also need to have a
socket open (potentially at the same time the the same time) to send and
receive simple UDP packets. It's possible I will have to serve very
___
lwip-users mailing list
lwip-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
explanation of the problem, which seems strange based on
the simple configuration.
Any HELP ?
Thanks,
Robert
Test code :
while (1)
{
sprintf((char *)buffer, (const char *)"test Frame %ld\r\0", i);
err = netconn_write(newc
explanation of the problem, which seems strange based on
the simple configuration.
Any HELP ?
Thanks,
Robert
Test code :
static void tcpecho_thread(void *arg)
{
struct netconn *conn, *newconn;
err_t err;
unsigned long i = 0
?
Thanks,
Robert
___
lwip-users mailing list
lwip-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
config looks normal. DHCP works, static IP works and the webserver runs.
>
> The code clearly shows that there should an exponential back off of DHCP
> discoveries but it does not work.
Sounds like a timing issue. Check on (my values are given):
DHCP_COARSE_TIMER_SECS
Dear all,
I am currently trying to set up unixsim on my systems and I am running into a
few problems.
At present I am able to ping and telnet the tap0 interface from the same box.
However, changing the gateway to 192.168.10.1 and the IP address to
192.168.10.2, I am unable to ping the new tap0
“I realize this isn’t an LwIP problem, but I bet a lot of people have this
problem waiting to happen as soon as a short chained packet is sent.”
And that is what these lists are for! Thanks for sharing!
From: lwip-users-bounces+rgrimes=irobot@nongnu.org
[mailto:lwip-users-bounces+rgrimes=i
I want to use a blocking UDP socket, and set a timeout value. If I don't set a
timeout value, then calls to lwip_recv() will (properly) block until a packet
is available - great! But if I set the timeout, lwip_recv() always returns
immediately, usually with -1 - timeout. Any ideas what is wro
>I think that you should buffer the pbufs, and NOT call tcp_recved()
until you consume a pbuf in your audio task.
Nice idea but the function tcp_recved() is callback in the raw API so
that is not possible as I understand it.
What you can maybe do if you are writing the server software also is
le time.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circular_buffer
and a nice tip for that don't do something like
counter++
if(counter == bufferSize ){
counter = 0;
}
you can use instead the modulo of the buffer size.
counter = (counter+1) % bufferSize
I hope this can help you.
Regards
Robert
Am 01.03
. The only disadvantage I think is that there are a few
cases in the code where a "length" of the field is specified, and those
would need their own macros.
Robert Laughlin
___
lwip-users mailing list
lwip-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
rounding quotes
are left off)::
LWIP_DEBUGF(TCP_DEBUG, ("tcp_bind: bind to port %U16_F\n", port));
This should work on all compilers, I believe, and the resulting code
would, of course be the same.
I may have the only compiler that cannot cope with the macros
gets dropped.
The IP packet is corect. Checked with Wireshark. The IP-Header length is
20 byte and IP-data is 40 byte
(correct for ICMP-Pig Request). But p->tot_len is always 58 or 59 in
order to be greater than 60 byte (whole IP packet).
I hope someone could help me.
Thanks in advance!
B
. Ill debug this.
Robert
> LwIP netconn API is thread safety, I think. I have many waiting UDP / TCP
> connections in separated thread and without problem.
> Do you have this sample "echo server" from
> http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/contrib/apps/udpecho/udpecho.c?re
conn, &destip, port);
netbuf_copy(buf, buffer, buf->p->tot_len);
buffer[buf->p->tot_len] = '\0';
buf->addr=&destip;
buf->port=port;
netconn_send(conn, buf);
netbuf_delete(buf);
Many thanks for help
Robert
P reply.
Can anyone help me for my problem?
Thanks in advance!
Best regards from Austria
Robert
___
lwip-users mailing list
lwip-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
dvance!
Best regards from Austria
Robert
___
lwip-users mailing list
lwip-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
e others, using the same way)
The only way I can bring this to operate is to use doxygen 'PREDEFINED' config
option, but this would be a nasty work to check to catch all needed options.
Does someone know what I did wrong, or how to solve this in an easy way ?
I'm using doxygen
n the client has already terminated the
connection, why does lwip still wait for some response ??
Robert Reither
Research & Development
Honeywell Life Safety Austria GmbH
Lemböckgasse 49
1230 Wien/Vienna, Austria
___
lwip-users mailing list
l
.
ping_timeout() is also static, perhaps that would be what should be
called, except that I have no sys_timeout() function as such.
Has anyone been using the ping code with NO_SYS? And if so, how do you
make it work for you?
--
Best Regards,
Robert
Fighting SPAM with Active Spam Filter, see
On Thu, 29 May 2008, Bill Auerbach wrote:
I pasted in a part of the latest memp_std.h with NO_SYS tests. Any chance
you've got a stale one?
Yep, turns out I was using an older copy of memp.c. Sorry about that.
--
Best Regards,
Robert
Fighting SPAM with Active Spam Filter, see:
http:
f(struct sys_timeout)
};
Turning off LWIP_RAW causes a simpilar error for the "struct raw_pcb"
entry. Of course I could just be doing something silly here...:)
--
Best Regards,
Robert
Fighting SPAM with Active Spam Filter, see:
http://a-s-k.sourceforge.net/
Best Regards,
Robert
Fighting SPAM with Active Spam Filter, see:
http://a-s-k.sourceforge.net/
___
lwip-users mailing list
lwip-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
eof(struct memp)))];
--
Best Regards,
Robert
Fighting SPAM with Active Spam Filter, see:
http://a-s-k.sourceforge.net/
___
lwip-users mailing list
lwip-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
Hi,
I have an application that is sending out TCP data to several client using the
sequential API. When a client disconnects gracefully, netconn_write returns a
negative value, and I can close the connection. However, if any of the clients
locks up (i'm using embedded clients), or a cable gets
Thanks,
That netif_set_default() did the trick.
Robert
On May 14, 2007, at 6:15 PM, Frédéric BERNON wrote:
Sending a datagram to a multicast group doesn't really need any route:
the lower 23bits of IP address are "mapped" on 23bits of MAC address.
See etharp_output :
higher level??)
I do see that it looks like multi-cast input is supported (Though I
don't know how much),
along with IGMP. I cannot figure out how to do the Multi-cast output.
Any help on where to look, or any other suggestions.
Thanks
Robert
On May 11, 2007, at 10:33 AM, Robert
from netconn_connect(..).
Thanks, at least I know that the stack supports it so I will keep
looking.
Robert
On May 11, 2007, at 10:24 AM, Frédéric BERNON wrote:
Hi,
I know that even before 1.1.0, we could send UDP on multicast address
(when I start with lwIP, that was one of first tests I
Hi,
I am trying to get version 1.2 of the lwip stack going, and while
I am having no problems with Webservers, an normal upd traffice. But
I have the need to send multi-cast UDP packets and running into the
whole stack locking up, and causing a reboot.
My question, is does the stack sup
On Apr 18, 2007, at 4:44 PM, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
Robert Morse wrote:
My driver, in the receive interrupt, just messages a HIGH
priority task, to actually
handle passing the data into the lwip stack.
How specifically does it do that? Does it call etharp_ip_input()
directly for
er to
figure out where it is stopping.
My driver, in the receive interrupt, just messages a HIGH priority
task, to actually
handle passing the data into the lwip stack.
So, my question is do you think I am pushing the lwip stack to far?
Robert
___
is closed.
I am trying to tack down how to catch the problem, and figure out who
is dropping the
packet. As I cannot see any other packets being dropped, and the
dropping of the [ACK] is
rare.
Robert
___
lwip-users mailing list
lwip-users@nongn
p for 16 transmit buffers. Just a quick
question.
Robert
Kieran
___
lwip-users mailing list
lwip-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
___
lwip-users mailing list
lwip-
ACK).
Also I am getting the following Messages: (I have some debugging turned
on).
tpc_listen_input: ACK in LISTEN, sending reset.
tcp_rst: seqno 5984823 ackno 3514939349.
This is repeated once in a while.
Any helps on where to look or any suggestions would be great.
Robert
dup.pcap
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
