Re: [lwip-users] Problems on Class-B network

2016-04-11 Thread Stephen Cowell
Should be 172 below... sorry. Stephen Cowell Project Manager/Engineer Plasmability LLC Office (512) 267-7087 Cell (512) 632-8593 www.plasmability.com On 4/11/2016 3:42 PM, Stephen Cowell wrote: Hey Simon... There is also an NTP client running... using SNTP. They have it set to 0.0.0.0, so

Re: [lwip-users] Problems on Class-B network

2016-04-11 Thread Stephen Cowell
Hey Sergio... Yes, I'm aware we are 'classless' now, but the nomenclature was the easiest way to describe/ google it. I understand /23... much the same as class-B. I assume that they have a virtual gateway devoted to each drop... not sure why, but the gateway is ping-able. We are shipping the

Re: [lwip-users] Problems on Class-B network

2016-04-11 Thread Sg
Stephen, As far as I know, class B network should work OK. I'm running devices with "strange" subnets, too, and they have no problem. Can you post an example IP setting of the device, gateway and client trying to ping the device? Does the device have multiple netifs or only one? Simon

[lwip-users] Problems on Class-B network

2016-04-11 Thread Stephen Cowell
I've got an embedded FTP product out in the field built on lwIP 1.4.1... so far so good... but now a customer has a problem getting one to work (static IP) on a class-B (172.31.xxx.xxx) subnet. Raw API, no OS... running FatFS and FTPD on Atmel SAM4E16E. I have not been able to obtain/set up a