Hello Charles,
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 06:21:09PM +, l...@moog.com wrote:
Sylvain,
Great, the latest patch works. Thank you very much.
Maybe you missed that, but the patch was actually broken by design,
please see bug #43173 [1].
Please also note that ppp-new branch has been merged
for lwIP users
Subject: Re: [lwip-users] ppp-new IP forwarding only works one direction
(Ethernet to PPP)
Hello Charles,
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 01:05:07PM +, l...@moog.com wrote:
Hi Sylvain,
I applied the patch and it seems everything is working. However, I
don't know much about VJ
Hello Charles,
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 06:03:40PM +, l...@moog.com wrote:
Sylvain,
I observed similar messages. I think VJ is in effect in my test.
Great ! :)
Sylvain
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
lwip-users mailing list
To: Mailing list for lwIP users
Subject: Re: [lwip-users] ppp-new IP forwarding only works one direction
(Ethernet to PPP)
Hello Charles,
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 01:29:33AM +0200, Sylvain Rochet wrote:
Finally, here we are… Hey!, since you have the setup to check IP
forwarding could you check IP
Hello Charles,
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 01:05:07PM +, l...@moog.com wrote:
Hi Sylvain,
I applied the patch and it seems everything is working. However, I
don't know much about VJ support, so I don't know if the PPP server
and my gateway device have actually negotiated to use VJ at
Hello Charles,
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 01:29:33AM +0200, Sylvain Rochet wrote:
Finally, here we are… Hey!, since you have the setup to check IP
forwarding could you check IP forwarding with VJ support enabled ? :)
Humm, I should have added that you must update your Git repository
before
] On Behalf Of Sylvain Rochet
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 6:15 PM
To: Mailing list for lwIP users
Subject: Re: [lwip-users] ppp-new IP forwarding only works one direction
(Ethernet to PPP)
Hello Charles,
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 08:03:13PM +, l...@moog.com wrote:
Hi Sylvain,
Good news, I got
Hello Charles,
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 12:13:02PM +, l...@moog.com wrote:
Sylvain,
I applied the new patch, but the following statement always cause Data
Abort exception run-time error. No matter I set ETH_PAD_SIZE to 0 or
2. The good thing is my compiler doesn't generate any error
Hi Sylvain,
Sylvain Rochet wrote:
I put the PPP header into the allocated space for PBUF_LINK if there is
enough space to do so, for a 14 byte PBUF_LINK_HEADER this is 12 bytes
of RAM wasted for NO_SYS=1, and 8 bytes for NO_SYS=0 with 32 bits
pointers, for me this is an acceptable
users
Subject: Re: [lwip-users] ppp-new IP forwarding only works one direction
(Ethernet to PPP)
Hello Charles,
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 12:13:02PM +, l...@moog.com wrote:
Sylvain,
I applied the new patch, but the following statement always cause Data
Abort exception run-time error
Hello Charles,
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 06:21:09PM +, l...@moog.com wrote:
Sylvain,
Great, the latest patch works. Thank you very much.
Finally, here we are… Hey!, since you have the setup to check IP
forwarding could you check IP forwarding with VJ support enabled ? :)
Sylvain
Hi Simon,
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 07:45:25PM +0200, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
Sylvain Rochet wrote:
I put the PPP header into the allocated space for PBUF_LINK if there is
enough space to do so, for a 14 byte PBUF_LINK_HEADER this is 12 bytes
of RAM wasted for NO_SYS=1, and 8 bytes for
Hello Charles,
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 06:47:43PM +, l...@moog.com wrote:
My test setup is like this:
Ethernet
PPP
PC - My gateway device Linux PPP server
192.168.0.211
Hi Sylvain,
Thank you for your reply. I really appreciate your help. The below are a few
comments and more observations.
Well, ip_forward() should call netif-output(), which in our case is
ppp_netif_output_ip4(), could you first check that ?
Sorry, I may confuse you about which direction the
Sylvain,
It seems the patch makes things worse - PPP connection couldn’t build-up
anymore. Below is the complete log message after applying the patch. It seems
the code stalled at very early stage.
*** FreeRTOS Demo Started! ***
netif_set_ipaddr: netif addrnetif: IP address of interface set
Sylvain Rochet wrote:
Oh dear, now I see what is happening.
PPP header is smaller than Ethernet header
[..]
This is actually a lwIP design issue, the only way we can fix that is by
adding a configuration option so pbuf from PPP are allocated with enough
extra space so a Ethernet header
Hello Simon,
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 08:12:00PM +0200, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
Sylvain Rochet wrote:
Oh dear, now I see what is happening.
PPP header is smaller than Ethernet header
[..]
This is actually a lwIP design issue, the only way we can fix that is by
adding a configuration
@nongnu.org
[mailto:lwip-users-bounces+cmao=moog@nongnu.org] On Behalf Of l...@moog.com
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 2:30 PM
To: lwip-users@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [lwip-users] ppp-new IP forwarding only works one direction
(Ethernet to PPP)
Sylvain,
It seems the patch makes things
Hello Charles,
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 05:30:12PM +, l...@moog.com wrote:
Sylvain,
It seems the patch makes things worse - PPP connection couldn’t
build-up anymore. Below is the complete log message after applying the
patch. It seems the code stalled at very early stage.
Hummm, this
Sylvain Rochet wrote:
PPPoE use PBUF_LINK, PPPoL2TP use PBUF_TRANSPORT, PPPoS use PBUF_RAW, it
all makes sense at first sight and IP forwarding should work for PPPoE
and PPPoL2TP. Maybe we should allocate a PBUF_LINK for PPPoS as well.
That would be a good idea for the forwarding case, I
Hello Charles,
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 06:37:02PM +, l...@moog.com wrote:
Below is more debug information and hope it's helpful for fixing the problem.
Regarding the code stalled at early stage, that's hardware related. I
am using ARM7 (AT91SAM7 to be specific), so the data alignment is
=moog@nongnu.org] On Behalf Of Sylvain Rochet
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 3:49 PM
To: Mailing list for lwIP users
Subject: Re: [lwip-users] ppp-new IP forwarding only works one direction
(Ethernet to PPP)
Hello Charles,
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 06:37:02PM +, l...@moog.com wrote:
Below
Hello Charles,
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 08:03:13PM +, l...@moog.com wrote:
Hi Sylvain,
Good news, I got it work with your patch
Yeah, happy to hear that.
Here is another patch, which should fix the issue in a way that can be
pushed to the repository, would you test it ?
plus the
Hello,
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 08:44:43PM +0200, S G wrote:
Sylvain Rochet wrote:
PPPoE use PBUF_LINK, PPPoL2TP use PBUF_TRANSPORT, PPPoS use PBUF_RAW, it
all makes sense at first sight and IP forwarding should work for PPPoE
and PPPoL2TP. Maybe we should allocate a PBUF_LINK for PPPoS
Hi Sylvain,
I try to get IP forwarding work between two interfaces - Ethernet and PPP. So
far, I can see it works in one direction, i.e., Packets from Ethernet can be
forward to PPP, but it seems lwIP stack silently drop the packets in the
opposite direction, i.e., from PPP to Ethernet. Can
25 matches
Mail list logo
