Re: [lwip-users] using two memory pools for pbuf

2011-04-07 Thread Kieran Mansley
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 15:54 +0200, Thomas Richter (TCD - DE/Dresden) wrote: > > I´m still working at the problematic that I have to inform from one > side > of the Ethernet connection to another side that RNR (receive not ready > = > can not handle more data, please wait) occurs. > I thought that

Re: [lwip-users] using two memory pools for pbuf

2011-04-07 Thread Thomas Richter (TCD - DE/Dresden)
Hi Kieran, I´m still working at the problematic that I have to inform from one side of the Ethernet connection to another side that RNR (receive not ready = can not handle more data, please wait) occurs. I thought that I can be use TCP buffer handling and if window size is 0 (in TCP header) than t

Re: [lwip-users] using two memory pools for pbuf

2011-04-07 Thread Kieran Mansley
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 15:09 +0200, Thomas Richter (TCD - DE/Dresden) wrote: > is there a possibility to handle two memory pools for pbuf´s in lwIP? Not as such. Where are your buffers getting used in such a way that they aren't available (e.g. on the data connection's send queue)? It may be poss

[lwip-users] using two memory pools for pbuf

2011-04-07 Thread Thomas Richter (TCD - DE/Dresden)
Hi, is there a possibility to handle two memory pools for pbuf´s in lwIP? I am using TSE Ethernet IF with lwIP-1.3.2. In my application I have opened two ports (first for control and second for data handling) at same net IF. My problem is following: if the buffer pool is full then both connectio