RE: [lwip-users] LWIP configuration large packet size

2010-05-13 Thread Kieran Mansley
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 03:24 -0400, Damon, Antoine wrote: > Hi > > > > I relance this subject. Please have you got an idea. Which IP address in the packet capture is lwIP? What should the transfer look like? It looks OK to me at first glance, but perhaps you are expecting more data in the

RE: [lwip-users] LWIP configuration large packet size

2010-05-11 Thread Damon, Antoine
Hi I relance this subject. Please have you got an idea. Best regards Antoine Damon De : lwip-users-bounces+adamon=idexcorp@nongnu.org [mailto:lwip-users-bounces+adamon=idexcorp@nongnu.org] De la part de Damon, Antoine Envoyé : jeudi 6 mai 2010 09:54 À : Mailing list

Re: [lwip-users] LWIP configuration large packet size

2010-05-06 Thread Navcon - Pedro Paulo Santos
Hi, I had the same problem you have now, and suggest you to read my topic here called "lwIP malloc fail". I had to send in a HTTP website a large package (a download). But the first question I would ask you is: do you try to send all the packages inside the tcp_recv callback function? If you d