Hello Charles,
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 06:21:09PM +, l...@moog.com wrote:
> Sylvain,
>
> Great, the latest patch works. Thank you very much.
Maybe you missed that, but the patch was actually broken by design,
please see bug #43173 [1].
Please also note that ppp-new branch has been merged m
Hello Charles,
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 06:03:40PM +, l...@moog.com wrote:
> Sylvain,
>
> I observed similar messages. I think VJ is in effect in my test.
Great ! :)
Sylvain
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
lwip-users mailing list
for lwIP users
Subject: Re: [lwip-users] ppp-new IP forwarding only works one direction
(Ethernet to PPP)
Hello Charles,
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 01:05:07PM +, l...@moog.com wrote:
> Hi Sylvain,
>
> I applied the patch and it seems everything is working. However, I
> don'
Hello Charles,
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 01:05:07PM +, l...@moog.com wrote:
> Hi Sylvain,
>
> I applied the patch and it seems everything is working. However, I
> don't know much about VJ support, so I don't know if the PPP server
> and my gateway device have actually negotiated to use VJ at
3:03 PM
To: Mailing list for lwIP users
Subject: Re: [lwip-users] ppp-new IP forwarding only works one direction
(Ethernet to PPP)
Hello Charles,
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 01:29:33AM +0200, Sylvain Rochet wrote:
>
> Finally, here we are… Hey!, since you have the setup to check IP
> forward
Hello Charles,
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 01:29:33AM +0200, Sylvain Rochet wrote:
>
> Finally, here we are… Hey!, since you have the setup to check IP
> forwarding could you check IP forwarding with VJ support enabled ? :)
Humm, I should have added that you must update your Git repository
before
Hi Simon,
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 07:45:25PM +0200, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> Sylvain Rochet wrote:
> > I put the PPP header into the allocated space for PBUF_LINK if there is
> > enough space to do so, for a 14 byte PBUF_LINK_HEADER this is 12 bytes
> > of RAM wasted for NO_SYS=1, and 8 bytes
Hello Charles,
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 06:21:09PM +, l...@moog.com wrote:
> Sylvain,
>
> Great, the latest patch works. Thank you very much.
Finally, here we are… Hey!, since you have the setup to check IP
forwarding could you check IP forwarding with VJ support enabled ? :)
Sylvain
sign
users
Subject: Re: [lwip-users] ppp-new IP forwarding only works one direction
(Ethernet to PPP)
Hello Charles,
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 12:13:02PM +, l...@moog.com wrote:
> Sylvain,
>
> I applied the new patch, but the following statement always cause Data
> Abort exception run-ti
Hi Sylvain,
Sylvain Rochet wrote:
> I put the PPP header into the allocated space for PBUF_LINK if there is
> enough space to do so, for a 14 byte PBUF_LINK_HEADER this is 12 bytes
> of RAM wasted for NO_SYS=1, and 8 bytes for NO_SYS=0 with 32 bits
> pointers, for me this is an acceptable outc
Hello Charles,
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 12:13:02PM +, l...@moog.com wrote:
> Sylvain,
>
> I applied the new patch, but the following statement always cause Data
> Abort exception run-time error. No matter I set ETH_PAD_SIZE to 0 or
> 2. The good thing is my compiler doesn't generate any err
g] On Behalf Of Sylvain Rochet
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 6:15 PM
To: Mailing list for lwIP users
Subject: Re: [lwip-users] ppp-new IP forwarding only works one direction
(Ethernet to PPP)
Hello Charles,
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 08:03:13PM +, l...@moog.com wrote:
> Hi Sylvain,
>
>
Hello,
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 08:44:43PM +0200, S G wrote:
>
> Sylvain Rochet wrote:
> > PPPoE use PBUF_LINK, PPPoL2TP use PBUF_TRANSPORT, PPPoS use PBUF_RAW, it
> > all makes sense at first sight and IP forwarding should work for PPPoE
> > and PPPoL2TP. Maybe we should allocate a PBUF_LINK fo
Hello Charles,
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 08:03:13PM +, l...@moog.com wrote:
> Hi Sylvain,
>
> Good news, I got it work with your patch
Yeah, happy to hear that.
Here is another patch, which should fix the issue in a way that can be
pushed to the repository, would you test it ?
> plus the
unces+cmao=moog@nongnu.org] On Behalf Of Sylvain Rochet
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 3:49 PM
To: Mailing list for lwIP users
Subject: Re: [lwip-users] ppp-new IP forwarding only works one direction
(Ethernet to PPP)
Hello Charles,
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 06:37:02PM +, l...@moog.com wrote:
Hello Charles,
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 06:37:02PM +, l...@moog.com wrote:
> Below is more debug information and hope it's helpful for fixing the problem.
>
> Regarding the code stalled at early stage, that's hardware related. I
> am using ARM7 (AT91SAM7 to be specific), so the data alignment
Sylvain Rochet wrote:
> PPPoE use PBUF_LINK, PPPoL2TP use PBUF_TRANSPORT, PPPoS use PBUF_RAW, it
> all makes sense at first sight and IP forwarding should work for PPPoE
> and PPPoL2TP. Maybe we should allocate a PBUF_LINK for PPPoS as well.
That would be a good idea for the forwarding case, I
Hello Charles,
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 05:30:12PM +, l...@moog.com wrote:
> Sylvain,
>
> It seems the patch makes things worse - PPP connection couldn’t
> build-up anymore. Below is the complete log message after applying the
> patch. It seems the code stalled at very early stage.
Hummm,
Charles
-Original Message-
From: lwip-users-bounces+cmao=moog@nongnu.org
[mailto:lwip-users-bounces+cmao=moog@nongnu.org] On Behalf Of l...@moog.com
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 2:30 PM
To: lwip-users@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [lwip-users] ppp-new IP forwarding only works one dir
Hello Simon,
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 08:12:00PM +0200, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> Sylvain Rochet wrote:
> > Oh dear, now I see what is happening.
> >
> > PPP header is smaller than Ethernet header
> > [..]
> > This is actually a lwIP design issue, the only way we can fix that is by
> > adding a c
Sylvain Rochet wrote:
> Oh dear, now I see what is happening.
>
> PPP header is smaller than Ethernet header
> [..]
> This is actually a lwIP design issue, the only way we can fix that is by
> adding a configuration option so pbuf from PPP are allocated with enough
> extra space so a Ethernet head
Sylvain,
It seems the patch makes things worse - PPP connection couldn’t build-up
anymore. Below is the complete log message after applying the patch. It seems
the code stalled at very early stage.
*** FreeRTOS Demo Started! ***
netif_set_ipaddr: netif addrnetif: IP address of interface set
Hello Charles,
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 03:55:26PM +, l...@moog.com wrote:
> Hi Sylvain,
>
> Thank you for your reply. I really appreciate your help. The below are a few
> comments and more observations.
>
> >Well, ip_forward() should call netif->output(), which in our case is
> >ppp_netif_
Hi Sylvain,
Thank you for your reply. I really appreciate your help. The below are a few
comments and more observations.
>Well, ip_forward() should call netif->output(), which in our case is
>ppp_netif_output_ip4(), could you first check that ?
Sorry, I may confuse you about which direction the
Hello Charles,
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 06:47:43PM +, l...@moog.com wrote:
>
> My test setup is like this:
>
> Ethernet
> PPP
> PC - My gateway device Linux PPP server
> 192.168.0.21
25 matches
Mail list logo
