On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 04:47:24PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 05/27/2014 02:58 PM, Seth Forshee wrote:
> >
> > The patches implement a psuedo filesystem for loop devices, which will
> > allow use of loop devices in containters using standard utilities. Under
> > normal use a loopfs mount wi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/29/2014 01:06 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Marian Marinov writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have the following proposition.
>>
>> Number of currently running processes is accounted at the root user
>> namespace. The problem I'm facing is that
>>
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 8:32 PM, S.Çağlar Onur wrote:
> Hi Serge,
>
> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
>> Originally we kept snapshots under /var/lib/lxcsnaps. If a
>> separate btrfs is mounted at /var/lib/lxc, then we can't
>> make btrfs snapshots under /var/lib/lxcsnaps.
>>
Quoting Marian Marinov (m...@1h.com):
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 05/29/2014 01:06 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > Marian Marinov writes:
> >
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I have the following proposition.
> >>
> >> Number of currently running processes is accounted at th
On Thu, 29 May 2014 08:40:01 +0200
Stéphane Graber wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 03:58:07PM +, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> > Quoting Dwight Engen (dwight.en...@oracle.com):
> > > On Wed, 28 May 2014 14:51:55 +
> > > Serge Hallyn wrote:
> > >
> > > > Quoting Dwight Engen (dwight.en...@oracl
Marian Marinov writes:
> Hello,
>
> I have the following proposition.
>
> Number of currently running processes is accounted at the root user
> namespace. The problem I'm facing is that multiple
> containers in different user namespaces share the process counters.
That is deliberate.
> So if c
