>>> On Wed, 13 May 2015 15:19:17 +0900
in message "[lxc-devel] [PATCH 2/2] doc: Update the description of -L
option in lxc-autostart(1)"
KATOH Yasufumi-san wrote:
> Add the description about displaying the value of wait delays for -L
> option
> Signed-off-by: KATOH Yasu
Add the description about displaying the value of wait delays for -L
option
Signed-off-by: KATOH Yasufumi
---
doc/ja/lxc-autostart.sgml.in | 4 ++--
doc/lxc-autostart.sgml.in| 2 +-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/ja/lxc-autostart.sgml.in b/doc/ja/lxc-autos
Signed-off-by: KATOH Yasufumi
---
doc/ja/lxc.container.conf.sgml.in | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/doc/ja/lxc.container.conf.sgml.in
b/doc/ja/lxc.container.conf.sgml.in
index 6419b36..c5f6845 100644
--- a/doc/ja/lxc.container.conf.sgml.in
+++ b/doc/ja/lxc.con
Quoting Harald Dunkel (harald.dun...@aixigo.de):
> Hi folks,
>
> to avoid postprocessing the output of lxc-info, it would be
> nice to have an option "--short", e.g.
>
> # lxc-info -n sample -c lxc.start.auto --short
> 1
>
> My first guess was that '-q' did the trick, but it didn't.
Quoting S.Çağlar Onur (cag...@10ur.org):
> Hey,
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Stéphane Graber wrote:
> > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 02:27:48PM -0400, S.Çağlar Onur wrote:
> >> Otherwise calling list_defined_containers just after installing LXC ends
> >> up with the following error
> >>
> >>
Hey,
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Stéphane Graber wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 02:27:48PM -0400, S.Çağlar Onur wrote:
>> Otherwise calling list_defined_containers just after installing LXC ends up
>> with the following error
>>
>> lxc: lxccontainer.c: list_defined_containers: 4310 No suc
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 02:27:48PM -0400, S.Çağlar Onur wrote:
> Otherwise calling list_defined_containers just after installing LXC ends up
> with the following error
>
> lxc: lxccontainer.c: list_defined_containers: 4310 No such file or directory
> - opendir on lxcpath
>
> $ /home/caglar/go/s
Otherwise trying to create an unprivileged container just after installing LXC
fails with following;
lxc_container: lxccontainer.c: do_create_container_dir: 772 No such file or
directory - failed to create container path /home/caglar/.local/share/lxc/rubik
$ ./create
2015/05/12 14:37:19 Creatin
Signed-off-by: S.Çağlar Onur
---
.travis.yml | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/.travis.yml b/.travis.yml
index dfb1ac1..974130d 100644
--- a/.travis.yml
+++ b/.travis.yml
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ compiler:
before_install:
- sudo add-apt-repository ppa:ubuntu-lxc/daily
Otherwise calling list_defined_containers just after installing LXC ends up
with the following error
lxc: lxccontainer.c: list_defined_containers: 4310 No such file or directory -
opendir on lxcpath
$ /home/caglar/go/src/gopkg.in/lxc/go-lxc.v2/examples/list
2015/05/12 14:23:08 Defined container
> LXC 1.1 is a stable release, just not a long term release like 1.0.
Oh, I missed that. Many thanks for the details.
___
lxc-devel mailing list
lxc-devel@lists.linuxcontainers.org
http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-devel
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 04:50:05PM +0200, Dietmar Maurer wrote:
> > Quoting Dietmar Maurer (diet...@proxmox.com):
> > > > Oh, right - so sounds like we should drop this then. Thanks.
> > >
> > > I this really a common scenario?
> >
> > Yes, very common.
>
> Oh - I though LXC 1.1 is the develop
> Quoting Dietmar Maurer (diet...@proxmox.com):
> > > Oh, right - so sounds like we should drop this then. Thanks.
> >
> > I this really a common scenario?
>
> Yes, very common.
Oh - I though LXC 1.1 is the development branch and not used in production?
Or do you use this scenario for develop
Quoting Dietmar Maurer (diet...@proxmox.com):
> > Oh, right - so sounds like we should drop this then. Thanks.
>
> I this really a common scenario?
Yes, very common.
___
lxc-devel mailing list
lxc-devel@lists.linuxcontainers.org
http://lists.linuxcont
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/lxc/lxc
Commit: 19fcf68ffb173f146a95c613ae9ccbff45f63a21
https://github.com/lxc/lxc/commit/19fcf68ffb173f146a95c613ae9ccbff45f63a21
Author: Cyril Bitterich
Date: 2015-05-12 (Tue, 12 May 2015)
Changed paths:
M templates/l
On 12.05.2015 01:52, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Purcareata Bogdan (b43...@freescale.com):
Kind reminder - any comments / feedback on this patchset?
Sorry, I thought I had replied to this? Namely, you are expressly
checking for /usr/local, but it might be better to check for the
paths which y
Currently, when installing OpenSSH in a Busybox container, the template searches
for all the OpenSSH client binaries available in the Debian distro package. The
included tools might differ from distro to distro, so make part of the tools
optional. The mandatory tools, without which installing OpenS
On certain systems, some binaries needed by the container features (dropbear,
openssh), may be placed in non-standard (aka non-distribution-managed
locations), such as /usr/local/*, /opt/local/*, etc. Don't copy the respective
binaries in the container and return a clear error why.
The user should
18 matches
Mail list logo
