Hi,
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 07:59:54PM -0600, Tycho Andersen wrote:
> In various places throughout the code, we want to "nullify" the std fds,
> opening them to /dev/null or zero or so. Instead, let's unify this code and
> do it in such a way that Coverity (probably) won't complain.
>
> Reported-
Thanks for your email
I am on vacation currently, will get back to you once I am back on
the job.
Kindly expect delays in my responses...
--
Thanks & Regards
Ashish Bunkar
Contact No.- +91-7259183696
___
lxc-devel maili
Thanks for your email
I am on vacation currently, will get back to you once I am back on
the job.
Kindly expect delays in my responses...
--
Thanks & Regards
Ashish Bunkar
Contact No.- +91-7259183696
___
lxc-devel maili
Thanks for your email
I am on vacation currently, will get back to you once I am back on
the job.
Kindly expect delays in my responses...
--
Thanks & Regards
Ashish Bunkar
Contact No.- +91-7259183696
___
lxc-devel maili
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/lxc/lxc
Commit: f58ad87a3f58802ed921abdadba587642fa125d5
https://github.com/lxc/lxc/commit/f58ad87a3f58802ed921abdadba587642fa125d5
Author: Daniel Golle
Date: 2015-06-09 (Tue, 09 Jun 2015)
Changed paths:
M src/lxc/monito
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 11:48:05AM +0200, Robert Vogelgesang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 07:59:54PM -0600, Tycho Andersen wrote:
> > In various places throughout the code, we want to "nullify" the std fds,
> > opening them to /dev/null or zero or so. Instead, let's unify this code and
Thanks for your email
I am on vacation currently, will get back to you once I am back on
the job.
Kindly expect delays in my responses...
--
Thanks & Regards
Ashish Bunkar
Contact No.- +91-7259183696
___
lxc-devel maili
Hello,
I have now unsubscribed this person from the list.
--
Stéphane Graber
Ubuntu developer
http://www.ubuntu.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
lxc-devel mailing list
lxc-devel@lists.linuxcontainers.org
http://lists.linuxcontaine
Hi Tycho,
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 05:48:52AM -0600, Tycho Andersen wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 11:48:05AM +0200, Robert Vogelgesang wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 07:59:54PM -0600, Tycho Andersen wrote:
> > > In various places throughout the code, we want to "nullify" the std
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 10:04:21AM -0600, Tycho Andersen wrote:
> In various places throughout the code, we want to "nullify" the std fds,
> opening them to /dev/null or zero or so. Instead, let's unify this code and
> do it in such a way that Coverity (probably) won't complain.
>
> v2: use /dev/n
In various places throughout the code, we want to "nullify" the std fds,
opening them to /dev/null or zero or so. Instead, let's unify this code and
do it in such a way that Coverity (probably) won't complain.
v2: use /dev/null for stdin as well
v3: add a comment about use of C's short circuiting
In various places throughout the code, we want to "nullify" the std fds,
opening them to /dev/null or zero or so. Instead, let's unify this code and
do it in such a way that Coverity (probably) won't complain.
v2: use /dev/null for stdin as well
Reported-by: Coverity
Signed-off-by: Tycho Andersen
Hi Tycho,
thank you for the updated patch, but you missed my intention, see below.
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 10:09:28AM -0600, Tycho Andersen wrote:
> In various places throughout the code, we want to "nullify" the std fds,
> opening them to /dev/null or zero or so. Instead, let's unify this code a
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 07:51:07PM +0200, Robert Vogelgesang wrote:
> Hi Tycho,
>
> thank you for the updated patch, but you missed my intention, see below.
>
> On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 10:09:28AM -0600, Tycho Andersen wrote:
> > In various places throughout the code, we want to "nullify" the std
14 matches
Mail list logo
