On Sun, 29 Jul 2018 at 18:39, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 05:44:06PM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> > From: Rafał Miłecki
> >
> > It's a valid case to call nla_put() with NULL data and 0 len. It's done
> > e.g. in the nla_put_attr().
> >
> > There has to be a check for data
On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 05:44:06PM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> From: Rafał Miłecki
>
> It's a valid case to call nla_put() with NULL data and 0 len. It's done
> e.g. in the nla_put_attr().
>
> There has to be a check for data in nla_put() as passing NULL to the
> memcpy() is not allowed. Even
From: Rafał Miłecki
It's a valid case to call nla_put() with NULL data and 0 len. It's done
e.g. in the nla_put_attr().
There has to be a check for data in nla_put() as passing NULL to the
memcpy() is not allowed. Even if length is 0, both pointers have to be
valid.
For a reference see C99 stan
