Quoting l...@zitta.fr (l...@zitta.fr):
Le 07/01/2014 01:07, Serge Hallyn a écrit :
Quoting l...@zitta.fr (l...@zitta.fr):
This change introduce mac address templating.
By setting lxc.network.hwaddr to something like fe:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx
each x will be replaced by a random value.
If
Le 07/01/2014 01:07, Serge Hallyn a écrit :
Quoting l...@zitta.fr (l...@zitta.fr):
This change introduce mac address templating.
By setting lxc.network.hwaddr to something like fe:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx
each x will be replaced by a random value.
If less significant bit of first byte is templated,
Quoting Serge Hallyn (serge.hal...@ubuntu.com):
Quoting Guillaume ZITTA (l...@zitta.fr):
This change introduce mac address templating.
By setting lxc.network.hwaddr to something like fe:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx
each x will be replaced by a random value.
If less significant bit of first byte is
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Quoting Serge Hallyn (serge.hal...@ubuntu.com):
Quoting Guillaume ZITTA (l...@zitta.fr):
This change introduce mac address templating.
By setting lxc.network.hwaddr to something like fe:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx
each x
Le 06/01/2014 20:01, Serge Hallyn a écrit :
Quoting Kent R. Spillner (kspill...@acm.org):
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 01:54:14PM +0100, Guillaume ZITTA wrote:
This chage introduce also a common randinit() function that could be
used to initialize random generator.
Is there any reason to always
This change introduce mac address templating.
By setting lxc.network.hwaddr to something like fe:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx
each x will be replaced by a random value.
If less significant bit of first byte is templated, it will be
set to 0.
This change introduce also a common randinit() function that could
Quoting l...@zitta.fr (l...@zitta.fr):
Le 06/01/2014 20:01, Serge Hallyn a écrit :
Quoting Kent R. Spillner (kspill...@acm.org):
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 01:54:14PM +0100, Guillaume ZITTA wrote:
This chage introduce also a common randinit() function that could be
used to initialize
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 01:01:03PM -0600, Serge Hallyn wrote:
When will this ever fail on Linux? Does Android provide /dev/urandom?
For one thing, when you're in a nested container and not allowed
to read /dev/urandom :)
Ahhh, yes, of course! :)
Do we need to worry about draining the
Quoting Kent R. Spillner (kspill...@acm.org):
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 06:04:07PM -0600, Kent R. Spillner wrote:
Hrrrmmm... My suggestion is more wasteful, but the original randinit()
can still be abused to drain the pool (albeit more slowly). I wonder
how bad it is in reality, however; I
