Quoting Tycho Andersen (tycho.ander...@canonical.com):
> In various places throughout the code, we want to "nullify" the std fds,
> opening them to /dev/null or zero or so. Instead, let's unify this code and do
> it in such a way that Coverity (probably) won't complain.
>
> v2: use /dev/null for s
In various places throughout the code, we want to "nullify" the std fds,
opening them to /dev/null or zero or so. Instead, let's unify this code and do
it in such a way that Coverity (probably) won't complain.
v2: use /dev/null for stdin as well
v3: add a comment about use of C's short circuiting
Hi Tycho,
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 05:48:52AM -0600, Tycho Andersen wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 11:48:05AM +0200, Robert Vogelgesang wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 07:59:54PM -0600, Tycho Andersen wrote:
> > > In various places throughout the code, we want to "nullify" the std
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 11:48:05AM +0200, Robert Vogelgesang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 07:59:54PM -0600, Tycho Andersen wrote:
> > In various places throughout the code, we want to "nullify" the std fds,
> > opening them to /dev/null or zero or so. Instead, let's unify this code and
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 07:59:54PM -0600, Tycho Andersen wrote:
> In various places throughout the code, we want to "nullify" the std fds,
> opening them to /dev/null or zero or so. Instead, let's unify this code and
> do it in such a way that Coverity (probably) won't complain.
>
> Reported-
In various places throughout the code, we want to "nullify" the std fds,
opening them to /dev/null or zero or so. Instead, let's unify this code and
do it in such a way that Coverity (probably) won't complain.
Reported-by: Coverity
Signed-off-by: Tycho Andersen
---
src/lxc/bdev.c | 8 ++
