On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 12:50:01AM +, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Christian Brauner (christian.brau...@mailbox.org):
> > If lxc_container_new() fails we check for ENOMEM and if so goto out. If
> > ENOMEM
> > is not set we will simply continue. The same goes for the call to regcomp()
> > but
Quoting Christian Brauner (christian.brau...@mailbox.org):
> If lxc_container_new() fails we check for ENOMEM and if so goto out. If ENOMEM
> is not set we will simply continue. The same goes for the call to regcomp()
> but
> instead of checking for ENOMEM we need to check for REG_ESPACE.
>
> Twe
If lxc_container_new() fails we check for ENOMEM and if so goto out. If ENOMEM
is not set we will simply continue. The same goes for the call to regcomp() but
instead of checking for ENOMEM we need to check for REG_ESPACE.
Tweaking: Since lxc-ls might have to gather a lot of containers and I don't
