Yeah so we had a discussion recently about "valid container names". lxc-ls
should follow whatever we decided there.
Quoting Harald Dunkel (harald.dun...@aixigo.de):
> On 04/13/15 14:54, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> > Can you give us an example?
> >
>
> Sure, here is a sample session:
>
> # lxc-create
On 04/13/15 14:54, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Can you give us an example?
>
Sure, here is a sample session:
# lxc-create -P /data1/lxc -n sample42 -t debian -- -r jessie
debootstrap is /usr/sbin/debootstrap
Checking cache download in /var/cache/lxc/debian/rootfs-jessie-amd64 ...
Copying rootfs to /da
Can you give us an example?
Quoting Harald Dunkel (harald.dun...@aixigo.de):
> Hi folks,
>
> "lxc-ls" implies a certain similarity to Unix' "ls" command,
> some releases ago lxc stopped to ignore hidden container
> directories.
>
> Did this happen on purpose? Is there a common config option
> fo
Hi folks,
"lxc-ls" implies a certain similarity to Unix' "ls" command,
some releases ago lxc stopped to ignore hidden container
directories.
Did this happen on purpose? Is there a common config option
for lxc to bring back the expected behavior wrt hidden
directories?
Regards
Harri
