On Sat, 29 Jul 2017 14:06:17 +0200
Christian Brauner wrote:
> Merged the patch today. Thanks guys!
>
Would it be possible to merge this change into the 2.0 branch
as well?
Thanx very much
Harri
___
lxc-devel mailing list
lxc-devel@lists.linuxconta
Merged the patch today. Thanks guys!___
lxc-devel mailing list
lxc-devel@lists.linuxcontainers.org
http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-devel
I really don’t know what happened to that patch, sorry about that. I’ve
proposed it now as pull request #1717 into master.
Thanks,
-serge
> On Jul 28, 2017, at 4:13 AM, Harald Dunkel wrote:
>
> PS:
>
> On Thu, 27 Jul 2017 08:45:49 -0500
> "Serge E. Hallyn" wrote:
>
>>
>> It looks like the
I see the patch in my archives now. I’ll get it pushed. Thanks.
Serge
> On Jul 28, 2017, at 4:13 AM, Harald Dunkel wrote:
>
> PS:
>
> On Thu, 27 Jul 2017 08:45:49 -0500
> "Serge E. Hallyn" wrote:
>
>>
>> It looks like these were done by commit
>> 44d397891e691ab994a69766cc72e57265b62da1,
I'm sure I'm just being dense. Can you point to your fix? I'll follow up.
Serge
Original Message
From: Harald Dunkel
Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 5:13 AM
To: Serge E. Hallyn
Cc: LXC development mailing-list
Subject: Re: [lxc-devel] lxc-create: file-based capabilities are lost
PS:
On Thu, 27 Jul 2017 08:45:49 -0500
"Serge E. Hallyn" wrote:
>
> It looks like these were done by commit
> 44d397891e691ab994a69766cc72e57265b62da1,
> and lxc-2.0.0 does have that commit.
>
44d397891e691ab994a69766cc72e57265b62da1 was created on
Mon Dec 3 09:53:10 2012, i.e. about 18 mon
I verified this on github:
% cd /tmp
% git clone git://github.com/lxc/lxc
Cloning into 'lxc'...
remote: Counting objects: 38059, done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (30/30), done.
remote: Total 38059 (delta 19), reused 31 (delta 14), pack-reused 38015
Receiving objects: 100% (38059/38059), 13.
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 02:48:28PM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Hi Serge,
>
> apparently all these fixes have been lost on the 2.0 branch:
Hm. are you sure? When I get diff lxc-2.0.0.. templates/lxc-altlinux.in,
rsync does not show up.
It looks like these were done by commit
44d397891e691ab99
Hi Serge,
apparently all these fixes have been lost on the 2.0 branch:
{hdunkel@dpcl082:lxc (stable-2.0) 507} grep rsync templates/* | grep rootfs
templates/lxc-altlinux.in:rsync -Ha $cache/rootfs/ $rootfs_path/
templates/lxc-centos.in:rsync -a $cache/rootfs/ $rootfs_path/
templates/lxc-d
Quoting Harald Dunkel (ha...@afaics.de):
> Hi Serge,
>
> On 06/15/16 19:00, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > Quoting Harald Dunkel (harald.dun...@aixigo.de):
> >>
> >> Using "rsync -SHaAX" in lxc-debian it works (on Jessie).
> >> Attached you can find a suggested patch for all (lxc 1.1.5).
> >
> > Than
Hi Serge,
On 06/15/16 19:00, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Harald Dunkel (harald.dun...@aixigo.de):
>>
>> Using "rsync -SHaAX" in lxc-debian it works (on Jessie).
>> Attached you can find a suggested patch for all (lxc 1.1.5).
>
> Thanks this looks good. Do you mind sending a signed-off-by?
>
Quoting Harald Dunkel (harald.dun...@aixigo.de):
> Hi Serge,
>
> On 06/14/16 17:10, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> >
> > Well I notice that copy_debian() rsyncs without -X. Does
> > adding -X fix it for you?
>
> Using "rsync -SHaAX" in lxc-debian it works (on Jessie).
> Attached you can find a sugges
Hi Serge,
On 06/14/16 17:10, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>
> Well I notice that copy_debian() rsyncs without -X. Does
> adding -X fix it for you?
Using "rsync -SHaAX" in lxc-debian it works (on Jessie).
Attached you can find a suggested patch for all (lxc 1.1.5).
Thanx for your help
Harri
Index:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 10:59:51AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Problem: A container setup with "lxc-create -t debian" has
> lost its file-based capabilities (used by systemd, ping,
> iputils, ...). I didn't check other template scripts, but
> since the major suspect is tar (used fo
Hi folks,
Problem: A container setup with "lxc-create -t debian" has
lost its file-based capabilities (used by systemd, ping,
iputils, ...). I didn't check other template scripts, but
since the major suspect is tar (used for creating a cache)
I would assume that this problem is not restricted to D
15 matches
Mail list logo