Re: [lxc-devel] lxc-destroy erased my hard disc

2014-01-14 Thread Dan Fandrich
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 04:48:57PM -0600, Serge Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Dan Fandrich (d...@coneharvesters.com): > > On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 06:23:24PM -0600, Serge Hallyn wrote: > > > Gah, that really does suck, sorry. The need to run as root has always > > > been annoying. We're finally at the p

Re: [lxc-devel] lxc-destroy erased my hard disc

2014-01-14 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting Dan Fandrich (d...@coneharvesters.com): > On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 06:23:24PM -0600, Serge Hallyn wrote: > > Gah, that really does suck, sorry. The need to run as root has always > > been annoying. We're finally at the point that some containers can be > > created and run entirely as non-r

Re: [lxc-devel] lxc-destroy erased my hard disc

2014-01-14 Thread Dan Fandrich
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 06:23:24PM -0600, Serge Hallyn wrote: > Gah, that really does suck, sorry. The need to run as root has always > been annoying. We're finally at the point that some containers can be > created and run entirely as non-root, so that your host should be a lot > safer. That's

Re: [lxc-devel] lxc-destroy erased my hard disc

2014-01-13 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting Dan Fandrich (d...@coneharvesters.com): > Well, not all of my hard disc, just /lib and /usr/lib, and not all of those > either because I got suspicious and stopped it before it finished. But > the damage was severe enough to require an OS reinstall. Gah, that really does suck, sorry. The

[lxc-devel] lxc-destroy erased my hard disc

2014-01-13 Thread Dan Fandrich
Well, not all of my hard disc, just /lib and /usr/lib, and not all of those either because I got suspicious and stopped it before it finished. But the damage was severe enough to require an OS reinstall. This was with lxc 0.8.0 on x86 Linux (the relevant 0.9.0 code looks substantially similar). It