Re: [lxc-devel] possible lxc-attach problem

2014-02-28 Thread S . Çağlar Onur
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 7:21 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Stéphane Graber (stgra...@ubuntu.com): >> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 06:11:25PM -0600, Serge Hallyn wrote: >> > Quoting S.Çağlar Onur (cag...@10ur.org): >> > > On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Serge Hallyn >> > > wrote: >> > > > Quotin

Re: [lxc-devel] possible lxc-attach problem

2014-02-28 Thread Stéphane Graber
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 06:21:35PM -0600, Serge Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Stéphane Graber (stgra...@ubuntu.com): > > On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 06:11:25PM -0600, Serge Hallyn wrote: > > > Quoting S.Çağlar Onur (cag...@10ur.org): > > > > On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Serge Hallyn > > > > wrote: > >

Re: [lxc-devel] possible lxc-attach problem

2014-02-28 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting Stéphane Graber (stgra...@ubuntu.com): > On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 06:11:25PM -0600, Serge Hallyn wrote: > > Quoting S.Çağlar Onur (cag...@10ur.org): > > > On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Serge Hallyn > > > wrote: > > > > Quoting Serge Hallyn (serge.hal...@ubuntu.com): > > > >> It seems t

Re: [lxc-devel] possible lxc-attach problem

2014-02-28 Thread Stéphane Graber
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 06:11:25PM -0600, Serge Hallyn wrote: > Quoting S.Çağlar Onur (cag...@10ur.org): > > On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Serge Hallyn > > wrote: > > > Quoting Serge Hallyn (serge.hal...@ubuntu.com): > > >> It seems to me these are the right things to do, but they'll take > >

Re: [lxc-devel] possible lxc-attach problem

2014-02-28 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting S.Çağlar Onur (cag...@10ur.org): > On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Serge Hallyn > wrote: > > Quoting Serge Hallyn (serge.hal...@ubuntu.com): > >> It seems to me these are the right things to do, but they'll take > >> some experimentation with the many possible hosts: > >> > >> 1. If / i

Re: [lxc-devel] possible lxc-attach problem

2014-02-28 Thread S . Çağlar Onur
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Serge Hallyn (serge.hal...@ubuntu.com): >> It seems to me these are the right things to do, but they'll take >> some experimentation with the many possible hosts: >> >> 1. If / is not shared, do nothing >> 2. if / is shared, and is no

Re: [lxc-devel] possible lxc-attach problem

2014-02-28 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting Serge Hallyn (serge.hal...@ubuntu.com): > It seems to me these are the right things to do, but they'll take > some experimentation with the many possible hosts: > > 1. If / is not shared, do nothing > 2. if / is shared, and is not the ramfs, then remount MS_SLAVE|MS_REC > 3. if / is ramfs,

Re: [lxc-devel] possible lxc-attach problem

2014-02-28 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting S.Çağlar Onur (cag...@10ur.org): > Hi, > > I was working on Fedora 20 system to investigate a possible go > bindings bug and realized that lxc-attach is not working as I > expected. [1] is some output captured with LXC@master on top of Fedora > 20 running a Fedora 20 container. I haven't t

Re: [lxc-devel] possible lxc-attach problem

2014-02-27 Thread Stéphane Graber
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 11:31:24PM -0500, S.Çağlar Onur wrote: > Hi, > > I was working on Fedora 20 system to investigate a possible go > bindings bug and realized that lxc-attach is not working as I > expected. [1] is some output captured with LXC@master on top of Fedora > 20 running a Fedora 20

[lxc-devel] possible lxc-attach problem

2014-02-27 Thread S . Çağlar Onur
Hi, I was working on Fedora 20 system to investigate a possible go bindings bug and realized that lxc-attach is not working as I expected. [1] is some output captured with LXC@master on top of Fedora 20 running a Fedora 20 container. I haven't tested this on my ubuntu machine and I'm wondering if