The cloning app should intelligently change the mount points to match
the new container's directory.
For example, this is the original mount
lxc.mount.entry = /usr/src /var/lib/lxc/container-35/rootfs/usr/src
none bind 0 0
if I clone "container-35", to "container-36", the clone should have a
mount
2014-05-16 3:13 GMT+08:00 Stephen Zhang :
> 2014-05-16 2:31 GMT+08:00 Fajar A. Nugraha :
>
> > On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 1:24 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Works for me. Did you do it like I did?
> >>
> >> root@trusty:~# status tty1
> >> tty1 start/running, process 443
> >> root@trusty
apt-get remove lxc did the job before compiling 1.0.3.
there's nothing left in /usr/bin and `which lxc-create` confirms it
comes from /usr/local/bin
So I understand, as expected, there shouldn't be any discrepancy between
the Ubuntu 1.0.3 packaged version and the one I compiled on Debian, right?
Oh I just find out how to change the default runlevel here [1]. But my
laptop's battery is empty, so I'll try it later.
[1]https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UpstartHowto
Stephen
___
lxc-users mailing list
lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
http://lists
2014-05-16 2:31 GMT+08:00 Fajar A. Nugraha :
> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 1:24 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
>
>
>> Works for me. Did you do it like I did?
>>
>> root@trusty:~# status tty1
>> tty1 start/running, process 443
>> root@trusty:~# status cron
>> cron start/running, process 407
>> root@trust
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 1:24 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> Works for me. Did you do it like I did?
>
> root@trusty:~# status tty1
> tty1 start/running, process 443
> root@trusty:~# status cron
> cron start/running, process 407
> root@trusty:~# status cron
> root@trusty:~# runlevel
> N 2
>
>
for
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 12:47 AM, Stephen Zhang wrote:
>
>
>
> 2014-05-15 20:13 GMT+08:00 Fajar A. Nugraha :
>
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Stephen Zhang wrote:
>>>
>>> I corrected the line in fstab "none /lxc/rootfs.ubuntu/dev/pts devpts
>>> defaults 0 0" to right path, failed.
>>> I co
2014-05-15 20:13 GMT+08:00 Fajar A. Nugraha :
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Stephen Zhang wrote:
>>
>> I corrected the line in fstab "none /lxc/rootfs.ubuntu/dev/pts devpts
>> defaults 0 0" to right path, failed.
>> I comment the line above, failed.
>> I change the whole fstab using
>> http
On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 13:02 -0400, CDR wrote:
> The template worked fine for me, but there is a material difference, I
> use a simple directory, where you are using a different approach to
> storage.
Oh, you're referring back to the original poster, not my post. Yeah,
we're trying to deal with hi
On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 13:11 -0400, CDR wrote:
> I don´t have the command
> lxc-status
> Should I have it?
Oh hell. My bad (one of my local scripts).
Should have been:
lxc-info -n {container}
Sorry about that.
Regards,
Mike
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Serge Hallyn
> wrote:
> > Quot
On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 13:02 -0400, CDR wrote:
> The template worked fine for me, but there is a material difference, I
> use a simple directory, where you are using a different approach to
> storage.
???
In what way am I not using a simple directory and for which storage? If
you mean the backing
I don´t have the command
lxc-status
Should I have it?
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
>> On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 22:04 +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
>> > On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Michael H. Warfield
>> > wrote:
>> >
The template worked fine for me, but there is a material difference, I
use a simple directory, where you are using a different approach to
storage.
Philip
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-05-08 at 08:54 +0200, Flo wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> is the Fedora tem
On Thu, 2014-05-08 at 08:54 +0200, Flo wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> is the Fedora template currently broken? I tried to create a LVM based
> Fedora 20 container but it looks like the template gets confused with
> lvm...
>
>
> lxc-create -n ipa01-test -B lvm --vgname=lxc1 --fssize=30G --thinpool
> thin_po
Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
> On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 22:04 +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> > On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Michael H. Warfield
> > wrote:
> > On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 04:40 -0400, CDR wrote:
> >
> > > The container is started, because I
On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 22:04 +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Michael H. Warfield
> wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 04:40 -0400, CDR wrote:
>
> > The container is started, because I am inside it via ssh
> > but I cannot use its consol
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 04:40 -0400, CDR wrote:
> > The container is started, because I am inside it via ssh
> > but I cannot use its console
> > lxc-console -n msterfe
> > msterfe is not running
> >
> > I am uploading the configuration a
On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 04:40 -0400, CDR wrote:
> The container is started, because I am inside it via ssh
> but I cannot use its console
> lxc-console -n msterfe
> msterfe is not running
>
> I am uploading the configuration as an attachment
> The container was created from the template, LXC 1.0.3
On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 04:40 -0400, CDR wrote:
> The container is started, because I am inside it via ssh
> but I cannot use its console
> lxc-console -n msterfe
> msterfe is not running
> I am uploading the configuration as an attachment
> The container was created from the template, LXC 1.0.3
>
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Stephen Zhang wrote:
>
> I corrected the line in fstab "none /lxc/rootfs.ubuntu/dev/pts devpts
> defaults 0 0" to right path, failed.
> I comment the line above, failed.
> I change the whole fstab using
> http://wiki.1tux.org/wiki/Lxc/Installation/Guest/Centos/6 pr
Hi,
have you uninstalled the packaged version of lxc prior to installing
the version from sources?
Most probably, the /usr/bin lxc takes precedence to the one you
installed to /usr/local prefix from the sources,
cheers,
On 15 May 2014 12:34, coolnodje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just compiled1.0.3 f
Hi,
I've just compiled1.0.3 from source on Debian 7.5, without trouble.
But I still get a behaviour that seem closer to v~0.8 that I got from
apt-get beforehand, than to the version coming with Ubuntu 14.04.
It's also not consistent with the https://linuxcontainers.org "How to
use it?":
no `lxc-
On Thursday, May 15, 2014 05:28:47 Fajar A. Nugraha wrote
>
> Not really. From the template file:
> --mirror) MIRROR=$2; shift 2;;
> --security-mirror) SECURITY_MIRROR=$2; shift 2;;
>
>
> It's a different parameter.
>
> Then again, I don't think security mirror will do you any go
Hi,
I just begin a series of article of LXC on gihyo.jp that is online
media of Japanese publisher.
http://gihyo.jp/admin/serial/01/linux_containers/0001
# of course, only Japanese :-)
Thanks,
KATOH Yasufumi
___
lxc-users mailing list
lxc-users@lists
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 4:29 PM, TuxRaiderPen
wrote:
> On Monday, May 12, 2014 06:59:48 Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> >
> > It's a way to make creating containers easier.
>
> That part I get... I am just not wrapping my head around the creation and
> especially the use of "preconfigured ones."
>
> Or
On Monday, May 12, 2014 06:59:48 Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
>
> It's a way to make creating containers easier.
That part I get... I am just not wrapping my head around the creation and
especially the use of "preconfigured ones."
Or really the creation provess... v. VMDK in a full VM.
> If you're
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 4:25 PM, TuxRaiderPen
wrote:
> On Sunday, May 11, 2014 01:57:29 Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> > Scratch that. The current template should work without any changes if
> > you specify --mirror.
> >
> > # lxc-create -n natty-test -t ubuntu -- -r natty --mirror
> > http://old-relea
On Sunday, May 11, 2014 01:57:29 Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> Scratch that. The current template should work without any changes if
> you specify --mirror.
>
> # lxc-create -n natty-test -t ubuntu -- -r natty --mirror
> http://old-releases.ubuntu.com/ubuntu
That will WORK, with ONE CHANGE:
line 241
2014-05-15 16:16 GMT+08:00 Fajar A. Nugraha :
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Stephen Zhang wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>> I installed a ubuntu maverick (really an old release, but I have to use
>> it) using the following command:
>>lxc-creat -t ubuntu -n ubuntu -f config -- -r maverick
The container is started, because I am inside it via ssh
but I cannot use its console
lxc-console -n msterfe
msterfe is not running
I am uploading the configuration as an attachment
The container was created from the template, LXC 1.0.3
dpkg --list | grep lxc
ii liblxc1
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Stephen Zhang wrote:
> Hi all,
> I installed a ubuntu maverick (really an old release, but I have to use
> it) using the following command:
>lxc-creat -t ubuntu -n ubuntu -f config -- -r maverick
> the official repository is invalid now, so I changed
Hi all,
I installed a ubuntu maverick (really an old release, but I have to use
it) using the following command:
lxc-creat -t ubuntu -n ubuntu -f config -- -r maverick
the official repository is invalid now, so I changed it to
http://mirror.usu.ru/ubuntu/ in debootstap script and lxc-u
32 matches
Mail list logo
