Quoting Fajar A. Nugraha (l...@fajar.net):
> (changed subject to match content)
>
> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Michael H. Warfield
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 15:33 +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> >> On further test, this seems enough
> >
> >> ###
> >> # cat lxc-default-with-syste
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 5:08 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Fajar A. Nugraha (l...@fajar.net):
> > (changed subject to match content)
> >
> > On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Michael H. Warfield
> wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 15:33 +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> > >> On further test,
Quoting Fajar A. Nugraha (l...@fajar.net):
> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 5:08 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> > would systemd be happy with it being mounted by lxc using an
> > lxc.mount.entry? I think that would be preferable to relaxing the
> > apparmor policy. i.e.
> >
> > lxc.mount.entry = /sys/fs/cgro
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Fajar A. Nugraha (l...@fajar.net):
> > On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 5:08 AM, Serge Hallyn >wrote:
> > > would systemd be happy with it being mounted by lxc using an
> > > lxc.mount.entry? I think that would be preferable to relaxing the
