[lxc-users] CAP_SETFCAP effective capability

2014-07-30 Thread István Király
Hi folks, .. I'm trying to figure out what the proper method will be to use node.js as web server. The problem is, that node, when run as user, can not bind to port 80, or ports lower then 1024. I would like to give the container permission to bind node to port 80, and eventually 443. [root@dev

Re: [lxc-users] Centos-7 x86_64 container - systemd-journald process eat CPU

2014-07-30 Thread CDR
I have had great success with Fedora 20 templates. My scheme in production is: ubuntu 14.04 as server and Fedora 20 as container. On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 7:16 AM, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > On Wed, 2014-07-30 at 14:32 +0400, mxs kolo wrote: >> Hi >> > AFA CentOS 7 in general goes - I have not y

Re: [lxc-users] Centos-7 x86_64 container - systemd-journald process eat CPU

2014-07-30 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Wed, 2014-07-30 at 14:32 +0400, mxs kolo wrote: > Hi > > AFA CentOS 7 in general goes - I have not yet had the time to > > incorporate the systemd logic from the Fedora template into the CentOS > > template. I just got back from being out of pocket for the last three > > weeks (and still comple

Re: [lxc-users] Centos-7 x86_64 container - systemd-journald process eat CPU

2014-07-30 Thread CDR
I support a bugzilla for LXC. Also, if anybody can analyze it properly, what is the difference between docker and LXC? Philip On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 6:32 AM, mxs kolo wrote: > Hi >> AFA CentOS 7 in general goes - I have not yet had the time to >> incorporate the systemd logic from the Fedora tem

Re: [lxc-users] Centos-7 x86_64 container - systemd-journald process eat CPU

2014-07-30 Thread mxs kolo
Hi > AFA CentOS 7 in general goes - I have not yet had the time to > incorporate the systemd logic from the Fedora template into the CentOS > template. I just got back from being out of pocket for the last three > weeks (and still completely not over being 6 hours jet lagged) and I'm > just starti