Hi Kevin,
Thank you for your feedback an wishes. We think LXC is great and we hope
Flockport containers can get folks started quickly and showcase LXC real
flexibility. It would be awesome to have some of you weighing in with your
experiences and insights.
Cheers
Tobby
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 5:
On 09/10/2014 03:33 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> Thanks for the update!
No problem! After the permissions fix, I started being affected by this bug:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=729986
For now I built a custom libnss-mysql-bg package with the patch in the
report above.
Cheers,
Quoting Andre Nathan (an...@digirati.com.br):
> On 09/09/2014 05:46 PM, Andre Nathan wrote:
> > I'm running Ubuntu 14.04 with LXC 1.0.4-0ubuntu0.1. I'm running a
> > container whose filesystem is populated via bind-mounts from the host.
> > The container starts up fine but for some reason calls to
All right, can you bump the sleep 5 up to say 200, then while it's
sleeping, look at /proc/pid/cgroup for (a) the script itself, (b)
the container, and then (c) in another shell try to lxc-attach to
the container using the lxc-attach command itself?
Quoting Medhamsh V (medha...@gmail.com):
> Sure.
Quoting Bin Zhou (lakerz...@yahoo.com):
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to enable dev loop access in LXC and set up glusterFS server
> volume on the loop dev.
> I add the following line to /var/lib/lxc/local-server-7/config
> lxc.cgroup.devices.allow = b 7:* rwm
Certainly looks fine.
> The container fai
John:
Thanks for the link to the "docs.oracle.com" reference. This was really
helpful.
Cheers,
Mike
On 09/10/2014 10:57 AM, John Drescher wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 1:52 PM, John Drescher wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Michael Chinn
wrote:
I see that lxc-ps was removed for
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 1:52 PM, John Drescher wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Michael Chinn
> wrote:
>> I see that lxc-ps was removed for v 1.x:
>>
>> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.containers.lxc.general/7623
>>
>>
>> Q: Why was it removed?
>>
>> Q: Is there a replaceme
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Michael Chinn
wrote:
> I see that lxc-ps was removed for v 1.x:
>
> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.containers.lxc.general/7623
>
>
> Q: Why was it removed?
>
> Q: Is there a replacement?
>
>
Here is some additional info on the commit that removed lxc
I see that lxc-ps was removed for v 1.x:
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.containers.lxc.general/7623
Q: Why was it removed?
Q: Is there a replacement?
Note: We are running 14.04 host with 14.04 CT's.
Thanks.
Mike
___
lxc-users mai
Bravo - as an old openvz/virtuozzo admin, I much prefer containers that can
function as full blown linux servers if needed, rather than the single app
model of docker, which is wildly popular despite its rather limiting
approach.
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Tobby Banerjee wrote:
> Hi LXC us
On 09/09/2014 05:46 PM, Andre Nathan wrote:
> I'm running Ubuntu 14.04 with LXC 1.0.4-0ubuntu0.1. I'm running a
> container whose filesystem is populated via bind-mounts from the host.
> The container starts up fine but for some reason calls to getpwnam()
> block forever in a futex() call before be
11 matches
Mail list logo
