Thanks. I thought I will run a script on the container startup which will do
the install and other steps... Hopefully the hooks will allow me to do so.
Anjali
On Feb 28, 2015, at 3:19 PM, "Bostjan Skufca"
mailto:bost...@a2o.si>> wrote:
If I want to do something like that (i.e. when bootstrappi
I understood from man pages that lxc.start.order setting should cause
containers to start in ascending order (lower the value, earlier the
startup). It turns out that with 1.0.7 this acts more like priority - the
higher the value, the sooner container starts.
Is anyone else experiencing this with
If I want to do something like that (i.e. when bootstrapping custom linux
system as LXC guest), I just chroot into newly-created container root and
do the "apt-get install ...".
This method uses host's network connection, but it requires container's
/etc/resolv.conf correctly configured. Also, if
Hi,
Is there a way to install packages (like bridge utils etc) on some template
like ubuntu while creating it via lxc-create? I read somewhere about --packages
command but don't seem to find it anywhere. I want to create a container and
install packages on it via a script without manually havin
Hope? :)
To get the actual value, one should probably explore uid_t type definition
if you want to skip reading sources of the shadow suite. Online search
returns this nice and clickable page:
http://lxr.free-electrons.com/ident?i=uid_t
This leads to "unsigned int" as final definition. On 64-bit
Hi all,
I was just debugging some IPv6 connectivity problems and realised that
container interfaces do not inherit host's default settings about IPv6
autoconfiguration.
More precisely I am talking about these two parameters:
- /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/*/accept_ra
- /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/*/autoco
Folks,
I figured this out, its because the directory does not exist in the container.
Thanks!
Anjali
From: Anjali Kulkarni mailto:anj...@juniper.net>>
Reply-To: LXC users mailing-list
mailto:lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org>>
Date: Friday, February 27, 2015 at 3:14 PM
To: LXC users mailing-li
Hi,
a priori, no problem with doing that. Simply deal with /etc/subuid and
/etc/subgid (on debian-like system, at least). For the limit, I don't
know but the man page for newuidmap considers "integers". Thus, we could
hope to deal with 2^32=4294967296 ids. In such a case, you have some
room t
Hi,
I am looking into individual user namespaces for each container.
The first container could have uids and gids from 10 to 165536.
The second container could have 20 to 265536, couldn't it?
How far can I go? Is there a limit?
Thanks,
David
___
