Re: [lxc-users] lxd networking - how to rid containers of lxcbr0

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:41 AM, jjs - mainphrame wrote: > Thanks for the feedback - Editing /etc/default/lxc-net in the ct solved the > problem. That's one I won't forget. ... or remove lxc from inside the container. Are you using nested containers? If no, there should be

Re: [lxc-users] lxd networking - how to rid containers of lxcbr0

Thanks for the feedback - Editing /etc/default/lxc-net in the ct solved the problem. That's one I won't forget. Regards, Jake On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 8:30 PM, Stéphane Graber wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 08:08:53PM -0700, jjs - mainphrame wrote: > > I'm starting to do

Re: [lxc-users] lxd networking - how to rid containers of lxcbr0

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 08:08:53PM -0700, jjs - mainphrame wrote: > I'm starting to do some testing with servers under lxd, and am confounded > by the inability to configure networking as desired. Obviously I'm missing > some elementary step here. > > For all my lxc servers, I could edit

[lxc-users] lxd networking - how to rid containers of lxcbr0

I'm starting to do some testing with servers under lxd, and am confounded by the inability to configure networking as desired. Obviously I'm missing some elementary step here. For all my lxc servers, I could edit /var/lib/lxc//config and voila - full control over the network modes and devices per

Re: [lxc-users] LXD uptime back to 0

oh ok, no problem. So that could be something like ps auxf|grep 19782|grep -v grep 165536 19782 0.0 0.4 37388 4464 ? Ss Mar15 0:05 \_ /sbin/init stat /proc/19782 File: ‘/proc/19782’ Size: 0 Blocks: 0 IO Block: 1024 directory Device: 4h/4d Inode: 47494006 Links: 9 Access:

Re: [lxc-users] LXD uptime back to 0

D'oh, I was misremember how it works. And good thing too, as what I was thinking couldn't possibly work. The number which should be used in /proc/uptime is the st.st_ctime for /proc/. Quoting Benoit GEORGELIN - Association Web4all (benoit.george...@web4all.fr): > For container "ben" > > This

Re: [lxc-users] LXD uptime back to 0

For container "ben" This would be : Dir: /sys/fs/cgroup/systemd/lxc/ben File: tasks /sys/fs/cgroup/systemd/lxc/ben] stat tasks File: ‘tasks’ Size: 0 Blocks: 0 IO Block: 4096 regular empty file Device: 17h/23d Inode: 439 Links: 1 Access: (0664/-rw-rw-r--) Uid: ( 0/ root) Gid: (165536/

Re: [lxc-users] LXD uptime back to 0

I cannot hide anything then ! You are right . I use openvswitch cat /proc/1942/cgroup 10:blkio:/system.slice/lxd.service 9:memory:/system.slice/lxd.service 8:hugetlb:/system.slice/lxd.service 7:perf_event:/system.slice/lxd.service 6:cpuset:/system.slice/lxd.service

Re: [lxc-users] LXD uptime back to 0

Quoting Benoit GEORGELIN - Association Web4all (benoit.george...@web4all.fr): > Interesting, look the process monitor : > > root 1942 0.0 0.1 72544 1280 ? Ss Mar10 0:00 [lxc monitor] > /var/lib/lxd/containers vps-01 > root 1984 0.0 0.0 72544 948 ? S Mar10 0:00 \_ [lxc monitor] >

Re: [lxc-users] LXD uptime back to 0

Interesting, look the process monitor : root 1942 0.0 0.1 72544 1280 ? Ss Mar10 0:00 [lxc monitor] /var/lib/lxd/containers vps-01 root 1984 0.0 0.0 72544 948 ? S Mar10 0:00 \_ [lxc monitor] /var/lib/lxd/containers vps-01 root 19734 0.0 0.3 72544 3460 ? Ss Mar15 0:00 [lxc monitor]

Re: [lxc-users] Using lxc-top command

On lun, mar 21, 2016 at 8:33 AM, slohani wrote: Hello all, I installed LXC on Ubuntu 14.04 using the following command: sudo apt-get install lxc lxctl lxc-templates But, lxc-top is not installed with this. How do I install lxc-top ? which lxc version you have

Re: [lxc-users] lxc memory limit

2016-03-22 11:07 GMT-03:00 Tamas Papp : > > > On 03/22/2016 02:51 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: > >> # echo "obase=16; 18446744073709551615"|bc >> >> > > Why is it in this so complicated format, whaah? > > Its' base 10, the most used base in this planet (I'd

Re: [lxc-users] lxc memory limit

On 03/22/2016 02:51 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 8:44 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 7:55 PM, Tamas Papp wrote: On 03/22/2016 01:51 PM, Dan Kegel wrote: that is the largest possible value. convert it to

Re: [lxc-users] lxc memory limit

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 8:44 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 7:55 PM, Tamas Papp wrote: >> >> >> On 03/22/2016 01:51 PM, Dan Kegel wrote: >>> >>> >>> that is the largest possible value. convert it to base16 and you'll see. >>> >> >> $

Re: [lxc-users] lxc memory limit

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 7:55 PM, Tamas Papp wrote: > > > On 03/22/2016 01:51 PM, Dan Kegel wrote: >> >> >> that is the largest possible value. convert it to base16 and you'll see. >> > > $ echo 18446744073709551615| base64 > MTg0NDY3NDQwNzM3MDk1NTE2MTUK base16, not 64 > >

Re: [lxc-users] lxc memory limit

On 03/22/2016 01:51 PM, Dan Kegel wrote: that is the largest possible value. convert it to base16 and you'll see. $ echo 18446744073709551615| base64 MTg0NDY3NDQwNzM3MDk1NTE2MTUK What should I see here? tamas ___ lxc-users mailing list

Re: [lxc-users] lxc memory limit

that is the largest possible value. convert it to base16 and you'll see. On Mar 22, 2016 4:55 AM, "Tamas Papp" wrote: > hi, > > $ lxc-cgroup -n bioreg-demo memory.limit_in_bytes > 18446744073709551615 > > And it has been never limited. > I'm sure, it's a fake value. What

Re: [lxc-users] snapshot listing

On 03/17/2016 07:20 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote: Quoting Tamas Papp (tom...@martos.bme.hu): On 03/17/2016 04:02 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote: Quoting Tamas Papp (tom...@martos.bme.hu): On 03/17/2016 12:09 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote: Quoting Tamas Papp (tom...@martos.bme.hu): hi, I remember, that not

[lxc-users] lxc memory limit

hi, $ lxc-cgroup -n bioreg-demo memory.limit_in_bytes 18446744073709551615 And it has been never limited. I'm sure, it's a fake value. What does it mean? Linux v302 3.13.0-65-generic #106-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 2 22:08:27 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Latest LXC 2.0.0.rc12. 10x