Re: [lxc-users] lxc supports arm?

On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 9:51 AM, fu huawei wrote: > > hello to all: > > I get lxc-1.0.8.tar.gz . > I want to port lxc on arm ,but exists error for cross-compile , > please tell me ,lxc supports arm ? or which version of lxc and > kernel ?or need addtional util ? > >

[lxc-users] LXC 2.0.2 & 2.0.3, LXCFS 2.0.2 and LXD 2.0.3 have been released!

Hello everyone, Today the LXC project is pleased to announce the release of: - LXC 2.0.2 & 2.0.3 - LXD 2.0.3 - LXCFS 2.0.2 We had to release two LXC bugfix releases due to a problem in the apparmor profile which was included in 2.0.2. Fixing the apparmor profile is the only change in 2.0.3.

Re: [lxc-users] [CRIU] Live Migration with LXD on Raspberry Pi2

On 06/17/2016 01:26 AM, Andrew Vagin wrote: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 03:56:39PM -0600, Tycho Andersen wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 02:56:45PM +0200, alex vk wrote: >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> I'm also trying to use LXD to migrate containers between the two raspberry >>> Pi 2 >>> >>>

Re: [lxc-users] using cgroups

hi,I have the same problem (cgroups not working as expected) on a clean Xenial build (lxc PPA NOT installed, LXD not installed)In my case I have some Ubuntu Trusty containers I really need to use on Xenial, but they won't start because I use cgroups.If I change the existing containers to remove

Re: [lxc-users] btrfs and LXC/LXD - disk quota exceeded

On 06/28/2016 06:32 AM, Benoit GEORGELIN - Association Web4all wrote: Hi, For once, simple question :) Hello Benoit, Please don't hijack threads. (That's where you take an existing thread and change the subject). It messes up the message flow. It's the same thing as people having a

[lxc-users] btrfs and LXC/LXD - disk quota exceeded

Hi, For once, simple question :) Do you have experienced any "disk quota exceeded" with a container using BTRFS as a backing storage ? LXD using btrfs Subvolume with quota applied to 10Go Container can't do any write after 24h uptime and less than 2Go used If I restart the container,

Re: [lxc-users] using cgroups

hi, I'm experiencing the same problem. I use "lxc.cgroup" to constrain resource usage and to provide access to devices in trying to re-use containers established under Trusty, I find that lxc.cgroup clauses prevent the container starting furthermore, if I create a new "test" container on