On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 11:49:02AM +0700, Sergiusz Pawlowicz wrote:
> With 1GB of memory is is not recommended to use ZFS not BTRFS,
> especially via a disk image file. Just forget about it.
The same VPS - as same as a VPS can be :-) - ran LXC on Ubuntu 14.04 fine. For
my work load perhaps the dir
On 2016-12-03 18:31, Pierce Ng wrote:
On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 11:49:02AM +0700, Sergiusz Pawlowicz wrote:
With 1GB of memory is is not recommended to use ZFS not BTRFS,
especially via a disk image file. Just forget about it.
The same VPS - as same as a VPS can be :-) - ran LXC on Ubuntu 14.04
On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Pierce Ng wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm running LXD on a Ubuntu 16.04 VPS with ~1GB RAM. My setup uses a disk
> image
> file, running on the default ext4 base filesystem, as the btrfs backend.
> The
> server runs four containers, of which only one is on the high side o
> You'd need to set arc to be as small as possible:
> # cat /etc/modprobe.d/zfs-arc-max.conf
> options zfs zfs_arc_max=67108865
What is a sense of using ZFS if you don't use its cache? Non sense. it
will work slower and less reliable than ext4.
S.
___
l
On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 6:01 PM, Sergiusz Pawlowicz
wrote:
> > You'd need to set arc to be as small as possible:
> > # cat /etc/modprobe.d/zfs-arc-max.conf
> > options zfs zfs_arc_max=67108865
>
> What is a sense of using ZFS if you don't use its cache? Non sense. it
>
- excellent integration wit
My 0.02
We have been using btrfs in production for more than a year on other
projects and about 6mos with LXD. It has been rock solid. I have multiple
LXD servers each with >20 containers. We have a separate btrfs filesystem
(with compression enabled) to store the LXD containers. I take nigh
No luck,
I installed rsync package from 16.04 (rsync_3.1.1-3ubuntu1_amd64.deb) and
gave it a try but no luck. Same problem. Snapshot +25G big aborts.
But it succeeded manually by the next command:
rsync -a -HAX --devices --delete --checksum --numeric-ids -q
/var/lib/lxd/containers/emergence/ /va
