On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 12:59:15AM -0300, Norberto Bensa wrote:
> 2017-03-29 0:29 GMT-03:00 Serge E. Hallyn :
> > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 12:16:29AM -0300, Norberto Bensa wrote:
> >> Hello list!
> >>
> >> In previous versions of Ubuntu I had lxc domain name resolution
> >> working, but it's broken
2017-03-29 0:29 GMT-03:00 Serge E. Hallyn :
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 12:16:29AM -0300, Norberto Bensa wrote:
>> Hello list!
>>
>> In previous versions of Ubuntu I had lxc domain name resolution
>> working, but it's broken for me in 17.04.
>
> https://help.ubuntu.com/lts/serverguide/lxc.html#lxc-ne
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 12:16:29AM -0300, Norberto Bensa wrote:
> Hello list!
>
> In previous versions of Ubuntu I had lxc domain name resolution
> working, but it's broken for me in 17.04.
>
> Name resolution inside the containers work:
>
> ubuntu@consulta:~⟫ ping fox
> PING fox.lxc (10.0.1.114
Hello list!
In previous versions of Ubuntu I had lxc domain name resolution
working, but it's broken for me in 17.04.
Name resolution inside the containers work:
ubuntu@consulta:~⟫ ping fox
PING fox.lxc (10.0.1.114) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from fox.lxc (10.0.1.114): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time
- Mail original -
> De: "Serge E. Hallyn"
> À: "lxc-users"
> Envoyé: Mardi 28 Mars 2017 21:07:08
> Objet: Re: [lxc-users] subuids and subgid range with multiple LXC
> containers
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 07:35:15AM +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 4:20 AM,
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 07:35:15AM +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 4:20 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>
> > Quoting BIGOT Adrien (adrien.bi...@smile.fr):
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Actually hosting many containers (2000+) with OpenVZ technology, we
> > > want to move to LXC/LX
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 4:20 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting BIGOT Adrien (adrien.bi...@smile.fr):
> > Hello,
> >
> > Actually hosting many containers (2000+) with OpenVZ technology, we
> > want to move to LXC/LXD.
> > The goal is to host up to 20 unprivilegied containers per
> > hypervisor.
Quoting BIGOT Adrien (adrien.bi...@smile.fr):
> Hello,
>
> Actually hosting many containers (2000+) with OpenVZ technology, we
> want to move to LXC/LXD.
> The goal is to host up to 20 unprivilegied containers per
> hypervisor. I'd like to know if there is some best practice
> regarding subuid and
Hello,
Actually hosting many containers (2000+) with OpenVZ technology, we want
to move to LXC/LXD.
The goal is to host up to 20 unprivilegied containers per hypervisor.
I'd like to know if there is some best practice regarding subuid and
subgid in particular if we must have one range of subui
- Mail original -
> De: "David Favor"
> À: "lxc-users"
> Envoyé: Lundi 27 Mars 2017 12:55:09
> Objet: Re: [lxc-users] Experience with large number of LXC/LXD containers
> Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 02:29:01AM +0100, Benoit GEORGELIN – Association
>> Web4all
>> wro
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 05:32:15AM -0700, Peter Steele wrote:
>
> >We have a need to create real time threads in some of our
> >processes and I've been unable to configure an LXC container to
> >support this. One reference I came across was to set a container's
> >real time bandwidth via the lxc.c
We have a need to create real time threads in some of our processes
and I've been unable to configure an LXC container to support this.
One reference I came across was to set a container's real time
bandwidth via the lxc.cgroup.cpu.rt_runtime_us parameter in its config
file:
lxc.utsname = t
12 matches
Mail list logo
