Re: [lxc-users] Experience with large number of LXC/LXD containers

On 2017-03-13 06:28, Benoit GEORGELIN - Association Web4all wrote: Hi lxc-users , I would like to know if you have any experience with a large number of LXC/LXD containers ? In term of performance, stability and limitation . I'm wondering for exemple, if having 100 containers behave the same

Re: [lxc-users] Creating a custom LXC container

are you suing lxc or lxd? in case it helps, I made a whole bunch of custom containers by followed this simple process (which came from: https://stgraber.org/2016/03/30/lxd-2-0-image-management-512/) : - download image (xenial in my case from ubuntu: ) - lxc exec c1 /bin/bash - make all the

[lxc-users] Creating a custom LXC container

Hello! I'm working on a code evaluation bot, and want to make a custom container for it to work in or out of. Would I just need to modify [1], and it will generate the container for me? [1] https://github.com/lxc/lxc/blob/master/templates/lxc-ubuntu.in -- Nicholas Chambers Technical

Re: [lxc-users] Newer upstream releases - Stable for production?

Yes, it would be. I also disagree that it's what most people would want. The majority of the feedback we've been getting from production users so far is that they're very happy having an extremely stable version of LXD that they don't need to think about and that gets frequent bugfixes and

Re: [lxc-users] Newer upstream releases - Stable for production?

Would it be against distribution policy to upgrade the lxd package in xenial? I feel like most users do not want 2.0, but that's what they get by default. On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 1:49 AM, Stéphane Graber wrote: Hi, So it really depends on how tolerant you may be to

Re: [lxc-users] right list for LXD?

Quoting gunnar.wagner (gunnar.wag...@netcologne.de): > hi everybody, > > I want to start using LXD. Is this list the right one for seeking > advice or is there any specific LXD mailing list? This is the place. Welcome. ___ lxc-users mailing list

[lxc-users] right list for LXD?

hi everybody, I want to start using LXD. Is this list the right one for seeking advice or is there any specific LXD mailing list? ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users

Re: [lxc-users] Enabling real time support in containers

Quoting Peter Steele (pwste...@gmail.com): > On 03/31/2017 10:16 AM, Peter Steele wrote: > >As you can see, the sched_setscheduler() call fails with an EPERM > >error. This same app runs fine on the host. > > > >Ultimately I expect this app to fail when run under my container > >since I have not

Re: [lxc-users] Enabling real time support in containers

On 03/31/2017 10:16 AM, Peter Steele wrote: As you can see, the sched_setscheduler() call fails with an EPERM error. This same app runs fine on the host. Ultimately I expect this app to fail when run under my container since I have not given the container any real time bandwidth. I had hoped

Re: [lxc-users] preferred way to redirect ports to containers with private IPs?

This depends on what you plan to achive and what your possibilities are big time. I've a mixture of iptables + haproxy/nginx. Gladly LXD remembers MAC and IP Addresses so manual entries in iptables is not the problem. iptables-persistent for reloading iptable rules For http/https/imaps i use

[lxc-users] preferred way to redirect ports to containers with private IPs?

Is there any "preferred" way of redirecting ports to containers with private IPs, from host's public IP(s)? host 12.13.14.15:53/udp (public IP) -> container 10.1.2.3:53/udp (private IP) I can imagine at least a few approaches: 1) in kernel: - use iptables to map a port from host's public

Re: [lxc-users] can't get kvm to work inside lxc

Just making it run is as simple as I wrote before, just 3 commands: # apt install wget qemu-kvm # wget https://cloud-images.ubuntu.com/releases/16.04/release/ubuntu-16.04-server-cloudimg-amd64-disk1.img # kvm -curses ubuntu-16.04-server-cloudimg-amd64-disk1.img You should see it booting. I