Hey,
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 12:19:35PM +, Datta, Souvik wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> I am new to container technology and at present, experimenting with LXC and
> runC. I need to run a system container on an embedded target which has a
> requirement of fast startup time.
>
> In this context, ca
Hi Mark,
> I'm trying to run Android Studio under an lxc container. The emulator in
> Android Studio requires /dev/kvm support. I am passing access to this
> device through with:
>
> lxc.mount.entry = /dev/kvm dev/kvm none bind,create=file 0 0
you need access to /dev/kvm on the host with the u
Hello Andriy,
no, it's not possible.
See https://github.com/lxc/lxd/blob/master/doc/clustering.md#forming-a-cluster:
"Note that all further nodes joining the cluster must have identical
configuration to the bootstrap node, in terms of storage pools and
networks."
Also, having a two-node cluster
Hi, all!
I have two-node LXD cluster, based on lxd 3.9 from snap. Both nodes having
local storage created over LVM. Now i'm going to join another node to the
cluster. But new node storage pool use ZFS driver. Is it possible to use
storage pools having same name but different driver across cluster
Hello,
I am new to container technology and at present, experimenting with LXC and
runC. I need to run a system container on an embedded target which has a
requirement of fast startup time.
In this context, can some one please guide me whether LXC or runC should be
used?
Is runC suitable for
Hello all,
I'm trying to run Android Studio under an lxc container. The emulator in
Android Studio requires /dev/kvm support. I am passing access to this
device through with:
lxc.mount.entry = /dev/kvm dev/kvm none bind,create=file 0 0
And I also have:
lxc.apparmor.profile = unconfined
Int
hi guys,
even if I never ever choose during
«lxd init» - procedure to create a local bridge
(lxdbr0) and set up an unmanaged brigde exclusively,
LXD do load iptables-modules into kernel
permanently as long as LXD is started.
I NEED
