On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 11:37:32PM +0300, Andrey Repin wrote:
> Greetings, Ede Wolf!
>
> > So please let me rephrase my question: Is there any alternative to
> > standard bridging for running unprivileged lxc containers?
>
> Is there a use case for unprivileged LXC containers?
> I fail to see one
Forest wrote:
>When I use the ps command's "lxc" format specifier, for example:
>
>ps -eo pid,lxc,command
>
>The second output column is supposed to show "the name of the lxc container
>within which a task is running. If a process is not running inside a
>container,
>a dash ('-') will be shown."
Greetings, Ede Wolf!
> So please let me rephrase my question: Is there any alternative to
> standard bridging for running unprivileged lxc containers?
Is there a use case for unprivileged LXC containers?
I fail to see one, and I'm using LXC for five-or-so years. If you are using
bare LXC, you are
