It does not work
cat /proc/cmdline
BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.17.1-031701-generic
root=UUID=3475cb20-ce8d-4f1a-bb5a-1f2dd0aeb515 ro elevator=noop
net.ifnames=1 biosdevname=0 selinux=0 ipv6.disable=1 apparmor=0
cgroup_disable=memory
but lxc-checkconfig says the memory
Cgroup memory controller:
I need to come up with a way to disable the cgroup memory controller in the
kernel command line, for Ubuntu 14.04 and Centos 7.
Is there a way to do this? I found a kernel command line to enable memory
controller, but not t disable.
___
lxc-users mailing
It's work in progress. Among others, systemd in container needs lxcfs,
and one of the issues you'd find is
https://github.com/lxc/lxcfs/issues/17 , which is just closed today,
so chances are most people don't have that fix yet.
On 4 April 2015 at 23:31, CDR vene...@gmail.com javascript:; wrote
My Fedora 20 container, on a Ubuntu 14.04 server, cannot write to /var/run.
Is there a secret reason that I use to fix it?
Other containers with non-systemd OSs can write just fine to /var/run.
Philip
___
lxc-users mailing list
Is it available automatically in Ubuntu lcx-daily?
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Stéphane Graber stgra...@ubuntu.com
wrote:
Gah, yes, I re-use my old e-mails and yes, I forgot to change the
subject... That's LXC 1.1.1, not LXC 1.0.7!
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 06:26:55PM -0400, Stéphane
).
Or simply chroot to the container fs from the host (NOT lxc-attach), and
repeat your yum install command.
--
Fajar
On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 2:09 PM, CDR vene...@gmail.com wrote:
is there any workaround?
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 8:44 PM, Király, István lak...@d250.hu wrote:
This happens
Downloading packages:
mtr-0.85-7.el7.x86_64.rpm
| 71 kB 00:00:00
Running transaction check
Running transaction test
Transaction test succeeded
Running transaction
Installing :
2:mtr-0.85-7.el7.x86_64
1/1
Error unpacking rpm package 2:mtr-0.85-7.el7.x86_64
error: unpacking of archive failed on
running?
b.
On 6 March 2015 at 22:25, CDR vene...@gmail.com wrote:
Downloading packages:
mtr-0.85-7.el7.x86_64.rpm
| 71 kB 00:00:00
Running transaction check
Running transaction test
Transaction test succeeded
Running transaction
Installing :
2:mtr-0.85-7.el7.x86_64
1/1
Error
It should work with 2G. The rest a bad excuse. It has become a standard in
the software industry.
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha l...@fajar.net wrote:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 6:51 PM, PONCET Anthony ff...@msn.com wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to used the
...@fajar.net wrote:
Do you have cgroupfs-mount installed?
Did you follow the steps I pasted?
Did you run lxc-start -F and look at the output?
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 3:05 PM, CDR vene...@gmail.com wrote:
What changes do I need to do at the host level so my provileged systemd
containers may work
container's systemd freeze, thus
nothing is listening on its tty1. And if you don't have systemd cgroup
mounted on the host (which is what cgroupfs-mount is for), it would
certainly be the case.
--
Fajar
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 2:50 PM, CDR vene...@gmail.com wrote:
I cannot get past this
root
I cannot make this solution work.
There are a lot of errors.
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 1:19 AM, CDR vene...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks. I think Serge may want to change permanently the config and other
in the on-line template so Centos 7 does work right away.
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 1:08 AM
I cannot get past this
root@ubuserver:/var/lib/lxc/c7v# lxc-console -n c7v
Connected to tty 1
Type Ctrl+a q to exit the console, Ctrl+a Ctrl+a to enter Ctrl+a itself
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 2:41 AM, CDR vene...@gmail.com wrote:
I cannot make this solution work.
There are a lot of errors
changes
(RPMS and SPECS folder), but it wasn't enough to run unpriviledged
container.
It should be reasonably safer than allow-the-container-to-do-anything
approach previously needed for c7.
--
Fajar
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 9:35 PM, CDR vene...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks.
I love Ubuntu
That is why I asked he question, the q does not exit.
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 6:13 AM, Dwight Engen dwight.en...@oracle.com
wrote:
On Mon, 9 Feb 2015 22:33:37 -0800
CDR vene...@gmail.com wrote:
Just out of curiosity, how do I exit lxc-top in Ubuntu 14.04?
The letter q means quiet. I do
Just out of curiosity, how do I exit lxc-top in Ubuntu 14.04?
The letter q means quiet. I do a Ctrl-C, to exit, but I am sure there
must be a cleaner way. The man lxc-top says nothing about this
___
lxc-users mailing list
would it prevent Asterisk from duping a core file on crashing?
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha l...@fajar.net wrote:
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 1:19 AM, CDR vene...@gmail.com wrote:
I need to use TYY=9 in a container, how do I achieve that?
You could probably start by NOT using
Thanks.
I finally found how to change the font.
Besides that, I will keep researching why it does not store a core dump.
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 2:36 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha l...@fajar.net wrote:
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 6:05 AM, CDR vene...@gmail.com wrote:
a) Sorry about the fonts
You're still
, CDR vene...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the response.
I disable selinux and a apparmor routinely. My containers are just a way
to
separate applications, there are no users accessing them, nothing bad can
happen.
So basically you are saying that there is no way to run Centos 7 under
.
I think somebody dropped the ball.
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 4:30 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha l...@fajar.net wrote:
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 3:25 AM, CDR vene...@gmail.com wrote:
In Ubuntu 14.04 fully updated and lxc latest.1.1, a container with
Centos 7
never allows connection via lxc-console
I need to use TYY=9 in a container, how do I achieve that?
Also I feel that my apps in the container crash more than when installed in
a virtual machine, ceteris paribus.
How do I write in the configuration that the container has the same
importance as the host?
I actually don't run anything on
In Ubuntu 14.04 fully updated and lxc latest.1.1, a container with Centos 7
never allows connection via lxc-console. It stays as below.
If you start the container with -F, you can see how it boots and indeed you
can log in via the console.
lxc-console -n centos7
Connected to tty 1
Type Ctrl+a q
11, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha l...@fajar.net wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 9:27 AM, CDR vene...@gmail.com wrote:
That is how we do business now, over TCP. By the way, I downloaded a new
derivative of Mysql, http://paralleluniverse-inc.com/, and it seems, in
my tests, several times
Dear friends
I have a container with mysql and wish to have all other containers, and
the host, being able to use a socket to post queries to my database. I
thought of sharing a common host-directory, such as /temp. Once all
containers can access the same directory, will they actually be able to
This is fascinating. I will try and report if it does work.
Now, suppose the container is a mount that at the same time it is exported
an NFS share. Will the computers that are remotely mounting that share, be
able to use the socket for querying mysql? That opens a realm of
possibilities for my
to
work in parallel.
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Michael H. Warfield m...@wittsend.com
wrote:
On Tue, 2014-11-11 at 15:03 -0500, CDR wrote:
This is fascinating. I will try and report if it does work.
Now, suppose the container is a mount that at the same time it is
exported an NFS
to adjust some 'ulimits'.
Guido
On 08.11.2014 03:36, CDR wrote:
There is something very wrong with LXC in general, it does not matter the
OS or even the kernel version. My OS is Ubuntu 14.04.
I have a Centos 6.6 container with mysql and 50 instances of Asterisk
12.0,
plus opensips
There is something very wrong with LXC in general, it does not matter the
OS or even the kernel version. My OS is Ubuntu 14.04.
I have a Centos 6.6 container with mysql and 50 instances of Asterisk 12.0,
plus opensips.
The memory is limited to 100G, but it does not matter if I limit it or not.
It
I am running the server version and also I did install python3.
Before I issue make rpm, I can see that it detects python3, when
configure finishes.
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 11:46 PM, Michael H. Warfield m...@wittsend.com wrote:
On Wed, 2014-11-05 at 23:09 -0500, CDR wrote:
Requires: /bin/bash
Requires: /bin/bash /bin/sh /usr/bin/python3 libc.so.6()(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.15)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.8)(64bit)
libcap.so.2()(64bit) liblxc.so.1()(64bit)
fantastic
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Ranjib Dey dey.ran...@gmail.com wrote:
awesome :-)
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Robin Monjo robinmo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I built a tool to download raw root file systems from the Docker Hub so
they can be used with LXC. Hope this may
I have reached a vey low limit on a macvlan network. One physical
interface, eth0, returns an error
lxc_conf - failed to set 'eth1' up : Device or resource busy
lxc-start 1413870325.642 ERRORlxc_conf - failed to setup netdev
lxc-start 1413870325.642 ERRORlxc_conf - failed to
You cannot have a macvlan bridge on an bridge interface, only on a real
ethernet device, like eth0, eth1, etc.
if you want to use a bridge, then use
lxc.network.type = veth
lxc.network.flags = up
lxc.network.link = br0
lxc.network.name= eth1
lxc.network.hwaddr = 00:de:f0:ca:d4:32
lxc.network.ipv4
an already-submitted patch), or
- use ubuntu with either official packages or daily ppa, which any
normal ubuntu user should be able to do (no dev skill required)
--
Fajar
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 6:35 AM, CDR vene...@gmail.com wrote:
This technology is being used on critical line-of-business
-0400, CDR wrote:
I did a git pull and ´when I issued a make rpm, it failed
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/lib/systemd/system/lxc-net.service
RPM build errors:
File listed twice:
/usr/lib64/python3.3/site-packages/_lxc-0.1-py3.3.egg-info
File listed twice: /usr
In Ubuntu I have a container that boots fine
but this does now work
lxc-console -n ivr
Connected to tty 1
Type Ctrl+a q to exit the console, Ctrl+a Ctrl+a to enter Ctrl+a itself
it hangs there for ever
what are the steps to figure the problem? The container is Fedora 20.
Yours
Philip
I noticed that in Centos 7 I have the command lxc-top while in Ubuntu
14.04 there is no such command. I like Ubuntu, but whay the issue with
is vital command?
___
lxc-users mailing list
lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
I already convered 100% of my company to Virtualization + LXC, It is the
optiomal technology mix. A few powerful virtual machines with several dozen
containers sharing the same kernel.
On Tuesday, September 9, 2014, Kevin LaTona li...@studiosola.com wrote:
On Sep 9, 2014, at 12:49 PM, Tobby
I have a Fedora 20 container with 10 nics
lspci -bv | grep -i ethernet -A1
04:00.0 Ethernet controller: VMware VMXNET3 Ethernet Controller (rev 01)
Subsystem: VMware VMXNET3 Ethernet Controller
Physical Slot: 161
--
05:00.0 Ethernet controller: VMware VMXNET3 Ethernet Controller
, but after a successful creation, it does not start and it
does not even give me an error message using --logfile
I am caught between a rock and a hard-place, it seems.
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Quoting CDR (vene...@gmail.com):
I have a Fedora 20
at 1:39 PM, CDR vene...@gmail.com wrote:
Same issue, it only shows eth0 and eth1. no error
I thing the container
I tried to compile LXC in Centos 7, so I could make a container, but
compilation fails. I already reported the issue to the development
list.
In Ubuntu 14.04, I created a new centos 7
, Michael H. Warfield m...@wittsend.com wrote:
On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 19:22 +, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting CDR (vene...@gmail.com):
Same issue, it only shows eth0 and eth1. no error
I thing the container
I tried to compile LXC in Centos 7, so I could make a container, but
compilation
It is impossible to manage a large installation of LXC containers
without lxc-top.
My impression is that the honorable engineers are separated from the
daily struggle of us, business men.
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Stéphane Graber stgra...@ubuntu.com wrote:
I think Dwight mostly wrote
Do a real bridge on the host and use it on both the VM and the
container. I do it all the time.
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Anjali Kulkarni anj...@juniper.net wrote:
Thanks - is there any way to do a private bridge between a VM and a
container, so that they can communicate? What's the use
make rpm fails.
Processing files: lxc-debuginfo-1.1.0-0.1.alpha1.fc20.x86_64
Provides: lxc-debuginfo = 1.1.0-0.1.alpha1.fc20 lxc-debuginfo(x86-64)
= 1.1.0-0.1.alpha1.fc20
Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(FileDigests) = 4.6.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) =
3.0.4-1
This is a philosophical divide. I live in the real world, and are
successfully moving all my business to LXC, or a combination of LXC
and real virtualization, where you have a few virtual machines with
hundreds of GBs of RAM and 36 or more cores, and these super-virtual
machines act solely as
, 10:32 -0400 schrieb CDR:
This is a philosophical divide. I live in the real world, and are
successfully moving all my business to LXC, or a combination of LXC
and real virtualization, where you have a few virtual machines with
hundreds of GBs of RAM and 36 or more cores, and these super-virtual
Dear Friends
I am using Ubuntu 14.04 and LXC latest. When the machine boots I would
like to cancel lxc-autostart, since I have a lot of containers and I
need to fix something first.
Is there a way? If not, maybe we may add a new command for that.
Also, I still cannot install lxc-top, to see what
Suppose you manage a box with 300 containers, all on autostart=1. One day
you reboot the box but you need to avoid all the contaoners to start. There
should be a command like
lxc-cancel-autostart.
Does it make sense?
On Friday, August 8, 2014, Harald Dunkel harald.dun...@aixigo.de wrote:
I am
www.arp.gda.pl
2014-08-08 21:21 GMT+02:00 CDR vene...@gmail.com:
Suppose you manage a box with 300 containers, all on autostart=1. One day
you reboot the box but you need to avoid all the contaoners to start. There
should be a command like
lxc-cancel-autostart.
Does it make sense?
On Friday, August
I support a bugzilla for LXC. Also, if anybody can analyze it
properly, what is the difference between docker and LXC?
Philip
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 6:32 AM, mxs kolo koloma...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
AFA CentOS 7 in general goes - I have not yet had the time to
incorporate the systemd logic from
I have had great success with Fedora 20 templates. My scheme in
production is: ubuntu 14.04 as server and Fedora 20 as container.
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 7:16 AM, Michael H. Warfield m...@wittsend.com wrote:
On Wed, 2014-07-30 at 14:32 +0400, mxs kolo wrote:
Hi
AFA CentOS 7 in general goes -
Dear friends
I moved a working container from Ubuntu 14.04 to Centos 7, and
networking does not work.
Previously, I had compiled and installed LXC from git, make rpm:
rpm -qa | grep lxc
lxc-debuginfo-1.1.0-0.1.alpha1.el7.centos.x86_64
lxc-1.1.0-0.1.alpha1.el7.centos.x86_64
How do I install lxc-top? I am using Ubuntu server 14.04, and lxc
1.04, from ppa.
It is not there, but I could imagine a more useful application.
Philip
On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 8:37 AM, Thomas Moschny thomas.mosc...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-07-04 6:48 GMT+02:00 Ajith Adapa ajith.ad...@gmail.com:
#
issue here, hidden.
If somebody has a Fedora 20 virtual machine, and wants to reproduce
it, I am more than happy to upload my container. It contains no
proprietary code
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Michael H. Warfield m...@wittsend.com wrote:
On Tue, 2014-06-17 at 09:42 -0400, CDR wrote:
I
I copied an LXC container fro Ubuntu Server to Fedora 20 and when I
start it I get
xc-start -n masterfe
systemd 208 running in system mode. (+PAM +LIBWRAP +AUDIT +SELINUX
+IMA +SYSVINIT +LIBCRYPTSETUP +GCRYPT +ACL +XZ)
Detected virtualization 'lxc'.
Welcome to Fedora 20 (Heisenbug)!
Set hostname
.
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 08:28:16PM -0400, CDR wrote:
I am worried about the few weeks part. If I want a slow/updating
server software, I could stay with Scientific Linux.
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 8:15 PM, J Bc jav...@esdebian.org wrote:
Good work. thank you.
2014-06-13 19:57 GMT+02:00
I moved a Fedora 20 privileged container from one server to another using
rsync -qarlpt --sparse
and now when the container starts I get the messages below:
Failed to insert module 'autofs4'
Set hostname to fedora-1.
Failed to install release agent, ignoring: File exists
Socket service
...@wittsend.com wrote:
On Sat, 2014-06-07 at 08:19 -0400, CDR wrote:
I moved a Fedora 20 privileged container from one server to another using
rsync -qarlpt --sparse
Were they both Ubuntu servers with the same kernel rev and did you copy
the configuration over as well? Same version of LXC
I am using a Fedora container in production since a few days ago,
created with LXC 1.0.3. No problems whatsoever. My environment is
Ubuntu server 1404.
dpkg --list | grep -i lxc
ii liblxc11.0.3-0ubuntu3
amd64Linux Containers userspace tools
Hard iron.
But containers should be transparent for him, since LXC does not use
any real virtualization.
As long as his kernel is the right version.
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 10:50 PM, Michael H. Warfield m...@wittsend.com wrote:
On Sat, 2014-05-24 at 22:12 -0400, CDR wrote:
I am using a Fedora
wrote:
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 9:55 PM, Stéphane Graber stgra...@ubuntu.com wrote:
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 01:56:54PM +, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting CDR (vene...@gmail.com):
Wrong, that RPM was in Fedora, in Ubuntu I connected to a repository.
But lxc-top is not there.
How do I get
I did my lxc build with RPM
make rpm, and it did not built it.
What are the steps?
I am using Ubuntu Server
Philip
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Steven Jan Springl
ste...@springl.co.uk wrote:
On Wednesday 21 May 2014 01:07:39 CDR wrote:
Dear Friends
I have 20+ containers with the same
Dear Friends
I came upon a bug that needs to be addressed
Suppose you have a container with a network like this
lxc.network.type = veth
lxc.network.flags = up
lxc.network.link = br20
lxc.network.hwaddr = 92:ea:2b:24:e0:27
lxc.network.ipv4 = 0.0.0.0/24
The container is UP, then you decide to
Dear Friends
I have 20+ containers with the same programs running. All of them are
cpu-intensive. But one of them is eating way more CPU than the
average. With top I have no idea which container owns that
program. Perhaps we need a new lxc-top that would identify the
process and the container, and
The container is started, because I am inside it via ssh
but I cannot use its console
lxc-console -n msterfe
msterfe is not running
I am uploading the configuration as an attachment
The container was created from the template, LXC 1.0.3
dpkg --list | grep lxc
ii liblxc1
The template worked fine for me, but there is a material difference, I
use a simple directory, where you are using a different approach to
storage.
Philip
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Michael H. Warfield m...@wittsend.com wrote:
On Thu, 2014-05-08 at 08:54 +0200, Flo wrote:
Hi,
is the
m...@wittsend.com wrote:
On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 04:40 -0400, CDR wrote:
The container is started, because I am inside it via ssh
but I cannot use its console
lxc-console -n msterfe
msterfe is not running
I am uploading
The cloning app should intelligently change the mount points to match
the new container's directory.
For example, this is the original mount
lxc.mount.entry = /usr/src /var/lib/lxc/container-35/rootfs/usr/src
none bind 0 0
if I clone container-35, to container-36, the clone should have a
mount
Dear Friends
I have a Fedora 20 LXC (libirt) container in production and I cannot reboot it.
So I used virsh edit mycontainer and added several
interface type='direct'
mac address='00:5A:0C:18:C9:E9'/
source dev='eth1' mode='bridge'/
/interface
The problem is that after it gets
Let me digest all this.
You must be right, because Fedora 20 containers are the only ones that
use systemd, in my box
many thanks
Federico
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Michael H. Warfield m...@wittsend.com wrote:
On Tue, 2014-05-13 at 13:00 -0400, CDR wrote:
I am forced to use libvirt-lxc
I decided to generate a new container and reinstall all my apps.
A lot of work, but you successfully demolished all my work so far, for
which I am thankful.
Philip
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 7:57 PM, Michael H. Warfield m...@wittsend.com wrote:
On Tue, 2014-05-13 at 18:13 -0400, CDR wrote:
Dear
lxc_container: Error creating container masterfe
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 8:15 PM, Michael H. Warfield m...@wittsend.com wrote:
On Tue, 2014-05-13 at 20:03 -0400, CDR wrote:
I decided to generate a new container and reinstall all my apps.
A lot of work, but you successfully demolished all my work so
I copied your file, copy-paste, and the file ended in
/usr/share/lxc/templates/lxc-fedora20
Then chmod +x
then lxc-create -t fedora20 -n masterfe
Am I wrong?
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 8:39 PM, Michael H. Warfield m...@wittsend.com wrote:
On Tue, 2014-05-13 at 20:30 -0400, CDR wrote:
I am
Dear Friends
I realize that this is not a list about Ubuntu, but here I have found
more knowledge and help that in any other place.
I am stuck since 48 hours ago in what takes 5 minutes in Fedora, i.e.,
setting vncserver to crate a desktop for me while the server is
headless, for it remains in
let me try that setup.
I am a few hours from installing Fedora 20, but, hey, I hate to give up.
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Robert Pendell
shi...@elite-systems.org wrote:
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 5:58 PM, CDR vene...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Friends
I realize that this is not a list about
I found that VNC is several orders of magnitude more responsive than
any X11 forwarding.
Am I wrong?
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 6:34 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha l...@fajar.net wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 5:26 AM, CDR vene...@gmail.com wrote:
let me try that setup.
I am a few hours from installing
start the desktop?
Yours
Philip
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Robert Pendell
shi...@elite-systems.org wrote:
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 5:58 PM, CDR vene...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Friends
I realize that this is not a list about Ubuntu, but here I have found
more knowledge and help that in any
- mainphrame j...@mainphrame.com wrote:
I'm pretty sure non-root users can use virt-manager as long as they are in
the kvm group
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 4:20 PM, CDR vene...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Robert
I did it as vnc and it works. But when I start the vncserver as
root, I get the classic
12, 2014 at 7:04 AM, CDR vene...@gmail.com wrote:
I just tried and they cannot.
In other distributions, there a file under /etc/X11/ where you need to add
AllowRemoteRoot=true
But I cannot find it in Ubuntu.
Has anybody ever used virt-manager from a vnc-client
I am sure there is a workaround
lxc-start -n utel-kde
lxc-start: call to cgmanager_set_value_sync failed: invalid request
lxc-start: Error setting cgroup memory.limit_in_bytes limit lxc/utel-kde
lxc-start: Error setting memory.limit_in_bytes to 5GB for utel-kde
lxc-start: failed to setup the cgroup limits for 'utel-kde'
I found the issue
This line
lxc.cgroup.memory.limit_in_bytes = 5G
makes the container fail to start
while this one works
lxc.cgroup.memory.limit_in_bytes = 536870910
I think that we should be free to specify the memory in any format, be
MB, G, etc.
Philip
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 6:00 AM, CDR
any container can take
down the box.
Philip
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 6:09 AM, CDR vene...@gmail.com wrote:
I found the issue
This line
lxc.cgroup.memory.limit_in_bytes = 5G
makes the container fail to start
while this one works
lxc.cgroup.memory.limit_in_bytes = 536870910
I think that we
any container can take
down the box.
Philip
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 5:58 AM, CDR vene...@gmail.com wrote:
The memory limit falis in Ubuntu Server
lxc-start -n utel-kde
lxc-start: call to cgmanager_set_value_sync failed: invalid request
lxc-start: Error setting cgroup memory.limit_in_bytes limit
On any Fedora 20 LXC containers, not libvirt, if I start the container
without the -d flag, I can enter the container via the console just
fine,
However, if I start the container without the -d flag, I get stuck like this
lxc-console -n fasterisk
Connected to tty 1
Type Ctrl+a q to exit the
Sorry, where do I see that
memory.max_usage_in_bytes
for my container?
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 9:21 AM, Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Quoting CDR (vene...@gmail.com):
I just tested and in fact, the memory restriction does not work.
a) set a 5G limit for the container
b) started
I detected an issue with all Fedora 20 containers that may benefit
from --nohangup workaround
If I start the container without the -d flag, then I cannot enter
the container via the console, later.
If I start the container without the -d flag, it works, bu then I
cannot get out.
So how do I try
I think we need to add a configuration to the global lxc.conf whereas
any given container may run only on one NUMA node, and if that is not
possible, it should not even start.
The performance for a container that is contained, so to speak, in a
single NUMA node, should be much higher that a
..and that goes in the container's config or in the master lxc config file?
So ask, I am still getting the handle on LXC
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@ubuntu.com wrote:
lxc.cgroup.cpuset.mems = 1
Quoting CDR (vene...@gmail.com):
I think we need to add
-0400, CDR wrote:
Does anybody know where in Canonical I may get support for LXC
bridged-NAT networking?
If the box is multihomed, it does not work.Although only one of the
NICs has an IP address, it simply cannot route packets to the network.
You may ping the default gateway
:12 PM, Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@ubuntu.com wrote:
That goes into the container config. If you wanted all containers on
the same node you could put it into /etc/lxc/default.conf before creating
containers.
Quoting CDR (vene...@gmail.com):
..and that goes in the container's config
The issue happens only with libvirt's virbr0 default network.
It does not happen with lxc lxcbr0
I am attaching the required information
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 2:03 PM, CDR vene...@gmail.com wrote:
No, my container has only one interface, and the host has many cards
but only one with an IP
open up.
Thank you again for your interest.
SUSE Linux Enterprise Beta Team:
Can you help?
This email address is associated with the account.
Philip
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 3:44 AM, Thorsten Behrens tbehr...@suse.com wrote:
CDR wrote:
I was under the impression that the LXC group could make
I had to install kernel 3.14.2 in order to avoid crashes with LXC.
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Shibashish shi...@gmail.com wrote:
Upgraded lxc
lxc-libs-1.0.3-1.el6.x86_64
lxc-1.0.3-1.el6.x86_64
CentOS release 6.3 (Final)
uname -a
Linux myhost 2.6.32-279.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Jun 22
Dear Friends
I succesfully created a SLES 11 SP3 container, but when I try to do this
mount -o loop /images/SLE-11-SP3-SDK-DVD-x86_64-GM-DVD1.iso /media
mount: Could not find any loop device. Maybe this kernel does not know
about the loop device? (If so, recompile or `modprobe loop'.)
Dear Mike
It does work indeed.
I suggest that the developers add these two lines to the sample configuration.
Yours
Philip
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Michael H. Warfield m...@wittsend.com wrote:
On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 06:25 -0400, CDR wrote:
Dear Friends
I succesfully created a SLES 11
, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Michael H. Warfield m...@wittsend.com wrote:
On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 10:33 -0400, CDR wrote:
Dear Mike
It does work indeed.
I suggest that the developers add these two lines to the sample
configuration.
It's been discussed and passed on for reasons for the time being
I know I am missing something, but I cannot figure it out.
It does compile in Fedora 20
git clone https://github.com/lxc/lxc.git
cd lxc
./autogen.sh
+ test -d autom4te.cache
+ rm -rf autom4te.cache
+ aclocal -I config
configure.ac:205: warning: macro `AM_COND_IF' not found in library
to install a newer autconf or automake
rpm -qa | grep auto
automake-1.10.1-4.131.9.1
autoconf-2.63-1.158
Can anybody from the developer's group confirm these versions?
Yours
Philip
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 11:00 PM, Michael H. Warfield m...@wittsend.com wrote:
On Mon, 2014-05-05 at 22:23 -0400, CDR
Dear friends
I got stuck in the simplest part.
First I tried libvirt and using the default network, whic works fine
in virtual machines
I created a Libvir-LSC container, and I can ping the host, DHCP
works,etc., but no forwarding to the network.
A pure LXC container with this network, failed.
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
