> On Dec 2, 2014, at 15:11, Stéphane Graber wrote:
>
> "build a container and then package up the result" is exactly what we do
> for the download template. A central Jenkins server
> (https://jenkins.linuxcontainers.org) builds all the supported templates
> every day for all the releases and a
Hello —
Instead of using templates to kickoff the creation of containers on various
hosts (potentially time consuming or difficult in restricted access
environments), I’m wanting to build LXC ‘base boxes’ (to borrow a word from
vagrant) and distribute them to hosts (via package management or HT
I've found an open bug tracking this issue:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/1226855
I'll move this to launchpad but am sharing here to close the loop for anyone
else hunting for a solution.
./JRH
> On Nov 7, 2014, at 15:41, Jason Harley wrote:
&
I’ve been successfully running KVM in an unrestricted container for some months
now. Yesterday I tried to attach an iSCSI device to a VM running in a
container, and discovered that there’s some trickery here involving NETLINK
namespaces.
I’ve found a few old mailing list posts (one with a patc
> On Jul 25, 2014, at 13:15, Serge Hallyn wrote:
>
> Quoting Jason Harley (jhar...@redmind.ca):
>>> On Jul 24, 2014, at 12:49, Serge Hallyn wrote:
>>>
>>> Does cat /proc/self/attr/current show the same thing for both?
>>
>> Yes, both report &q
On Jul 24, 2014, at 12:49, Serge Hallyn wrote:
>
> Does cat /proc/self/attr/current show the same thing for both?
Yes, both report "unconfined".
http://pastebin.com/vh9vqZXD
./JRH
___
lxc-users mailing list
lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
http:/
Hi list,
I’m new to LXC and have been spending a lot of time putting it through its
paces over the last week or so. I have just discovered that the ‘sys_admin’
capability isn’t allowing mounts to work for ephemeral instances on Ubuntu
14.04 (kernel 3.13.0-32-generic, LXC 1.0.4-0ubuntu0.1). If
