Re: [lxc-users] 1.0.3 on Debian 7.5 not consistent with documentation

2014-05-22 Thread Nikola Kotur
On Wed, 21 May 2014 18:05:44 +0800 coolnodje coolno...@gmail.com wrote: I realize there's no template coming with your Debian packaging (/usr/share/lxc/templates is empty). Was it intentional? Yes, I don't need templates, so I didn't add them to the package. In case you do want to build

Re: [lxc-users] 1.0.3 on Debian 7.5 not consistent with documentation

2014-05-20 Thread Nikola Kotur
On Fri, 16 May 2014 10:43:11 +0200 Wojciech Arabczyk ara...@gmail.com wrote: It would be best, if you'd try to create a deb package from the source package in sid, and then install via dpkg. Sorry, but i don't have time to provide specific instructions. You'll have to dig it out yourself. If

Re: [lxc-users] 1.0.3 on Debian 7.5 not consistent with documentation

2014-05-20 Thread coolnodje
Hi, you're right on time, I was just beginning to compile lxc from the master branch and looking at options. Thanks for the package, it sounds great. Just to make sure, since I've already tried to install 1.0.3 from source and didn't get something consistent with the doc: do you get commands

Re: [lxc-users] 1.0.3 on Debian 7.5 not consistent with documentation

2014-05-20 Thread Nikola Kotur
On Tue, 20 May 2014 17:36:39 +0800 coolnodje coolno...@gmail.com wrote: Just to make sure, since I've already tried to install 1.0.3 from source and didn't get something consistent with the doc: do you get commands that actually behave like described in linuxcontainers.org? I mean `lxc-ls

Re: [lxc-users] 1.0.3 on Debian 7.5 not consistent with documentation

2014-05-20 Thread coolnodje
done, this is great and seems to be working fine, at least it's as expected. I'll copy in some container now and check that everything is all right. I understand now I wasn't probably enabling enough option during ./configure, but it seemed odd that even the very basic options like --version

Re: [lxc-users] 1.0.3 on Debian 7.5 not consistent with documentation

2014-05-20 Thread Wojciech Arabczyk
As far as i remember, my hand compilation experience shows, that it is really necessary to build against python3 - otherwise all those --fancy options don't work. ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org

Re: [lxc-users] 1.0.3 on Debian 7.5 not consistent with documentation

2014-05-16 Thread Wojciech Arabczyk
It would be best, if you'd try to create a deb package from the source package in sid, and then install via dpkg. Sorry, but i don't have time to provide specific instructions. You'll have to dig it out yourself. With kind regards, On 16 May 2014 05:26, coolnodje coolno...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: [lxc-users] 1.0.3 on Debian 7.5 not consistent with documentation

2014-05-16 Thread coolnodje
I'm willing to try but I don't see how a deb package would be different from the latest source install. What's the idea? 1.0.3-1 seems to be more recent but I doubt it'd be much different from 1.0.3. How about compiling from git repo HEAD? thanks Wojciech Arabczyk mailto:ara...@gmail.com 16 May

[lxc-users] 1.0.3 on Debian 7.5 not consistent with documentation

2014-05-15 Thread coolnodje
Hi, I've just compiled1.0.3 from source on Debian 7.5, without trouble. But I still get a behaviour that seem closer to v~0.8 that I got from apt-get beforehand, than to the version coming with Ubuntu 14.04. It's also not consistent with the https://linuxcontainers.org How to use it?: no

Re: [lxc-users] 1.0.3 on Debian 7.5 not consistent with documentation

2014-05-15 Thread Wojciech Arabczyk
Hi, have you uninstalled the packaged version of lxc prior to installing the version from sources? Most probably, the /usr/bin lxc takes precedence to the one you installed to /usr/local prefix from the sources, cheers, On 15 May 2014 12:34, coolnodje coolno...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I've

Re: [lxc-users] 1.0.3 on Debian 7.5 not consistent with documentation

2014-05-15 Thread coolnodje
apt-get remove lxc did the job before compiling 1.0.3. there's nothing left in /usr/bin and `which lxc-create` confirms it comes from /usr/local/bin So I understand, as expected, there shouldn't be any discrepancy between the Ubuntu 1.0.3 packaged version and the one I compiled on Debian, right?