On Wed, 21 May 2014 18:05:44 +0800
coolnodje coolno...@gmail.com wrote:
I realize there's no template coming with your Debian packaging
(/usr/share/lxc/templates is empty).
Was it intentional?
Yes, I don't need templates, so I didn't add them to the package.
In case you do want to build
On Fri, 16 May 2014 10:43:11 +0200
Wojciech Arabczyk ara...@gmail.com wrote:
It would be best, if you'd try to create a deb package from the source
package in sid, and then install via dpkg. Sorry, but i don't have
time to provide specific instructions. You'll have to dig it out
yourself.
If
Hi,
you're right on time, I was just beginning to compile lxc from the
master branch and looking at options.
Thanks for the package, it sounds great.
Just to make sure, since I've already tried to install 1.0.3 from source
and didn't get something consistent with the doc: do you get commands
On Tue, 20 May 2014 17:36:39 +0800
coolnodje coolno...@gmail.com wrote:
Just to make sure, since I've already tried to install 1.0.3 from
source and didn't get something consistent with the doc: do you get
commands that actually behave like described in linuxcontainers.org?
I mean `lxc-ls
done, this is great and seems to be working fine, at least it's as expected.
I'll copy in some container now and check that everything is all right.
I understand now I wasn't probably enabling enough option during
./configure, but it seemed odd that even the very basic options like
--version
As far as i remember, my hand compilation experience shows, that it is
really necessary
to build against python3 - otherwise all those --fancy options don't work.
___
lxc-users mailing list
lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
It would be best, if you'd try to create a deb package from the source
package in sid,
and then install via dpkg. Sorry, but i don't have time to provide specific
instructions.
You'll have to dig it out yourself.
With kind regards,
On 16 May 2014 05:26, coolnodje coolno...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm willing to try but I don't see how a deb package would be different
from the latest source install. What's the idea?
1.0.3-1 seems to be more recent but I doubt it'd be much different from
1.0.3.
How about compiling from git repo HEAD?
thanks
Wojciech Arabczyk mailto:ara...@gmail.com
16 May
Hi,
I've just compiled1.0.3 from source on Debian 7.5, without trouble.
But I still get a behaviour that seem closer to v~0.8 that I got from
apt-get beforehand, than to the version coming with Ubuntu 14.04.
It's also not consistent with the https://linuxcontainers.org How to
use it?:
no
Hi,
have you uninstalled the packaged version of lxc prior to installing
the version from sources?
Most probably, the /usr/bin lxc takes precedence to the one you
installed to /usr/local prefix from the sources,
cheers,
On 15 May 2014 12:34, coolnodje coolno...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I've
apt-get remove lxc did the job before compiling 1.0.3.
there's nothing left in /usr/bin and `which lxc-create` confirms it
comes from /usr/local/bin
So I understand, as expected, there shouldn't be any discrepancy between
the Ubuntu 1.0.3 packaged version and the one I compiled on Debian, right?
11 matches
Mail list logo