Re: [lxc-users] I think terminology of LXD & LXC still confuses newcomers

On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 5:19 PM, brian mullan wrote: > Long time users of LXC and now LXD understand the difference & difference of > purpose. > > However, it seems to me that for newcomers to LXD the continuance of > reference to LXC seems to cause confusion for those

Re: [lxc-users] I think terminology of LXD & LXC still confuses newcomers

Hi! New user here (first post!) been using LXC/LXD for a few weeks. First, awesome project, wish I had discovered it sooner. Second. I totally agree with this statement. As someone who is learning all about LXC/LXD I was completely confused about commands and syntax in the beginning. I started

Re: [lxc-users] I think terminology of LXD & LXC still confuses newcomers

> *lxc list* I think LXD should not call the binary 'lxc'. Maybe it would cause less confusion when called 'lxd'.. LXD is not the only project which uses LXC a base. For example, Proxmox VE also provide a front-end for LXC (called 'pct'). And it is still valid to use the 'old' lxc-XXX style

[lxc-users] I think terminology of LXD & LXC still confuses newcomers

Long time users of LXC and now LXD understand the difference & difference of purpose. However, it seems to me that for newcomers to LXD the continuance of reference to LXC seems to cause confusion for those people when doing google searches & they find CLI references/examples for the original LXC