On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 07:17:42PM +0100, Dirk Geschke wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> > > Does this mean that lxc 3.0 is systemd-only?
> >
> > No!
> >
> > This has no effect whatsoever on what init system you are running. This
> > is completely orthogonal and to some extent always has been. In fact,
Hi Christian,
> > Does this mean that lxc 3.0 is systemd-only?
>
> No!
>
> This has no effect whatsoever on what init system you are running. This
> is completely orthogonal and to some extent always has been. In fact,
> we've become even more agnostic wrt to what init binary (be it a full
> ini
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 13:04:00PM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Does this mean that lxc 3.0 is systemd-only?
No!
This has no effect whatsoever on what init system you are running. This
is completely orthogonal and to some extent always has been. In fact,
we've become even more agnostic wrt to w
Does this mean that lxc 3.0 is systemd-only?
Regards
Harri
___
lxc-users mailing list
lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
Hey everyone,
This is another update about the development of LXC 3.0. As of yesterday
the cgmanager and cgfs cgroup drivers have been removed from the
codebase. In the good long tradition of all LXC projects to try our
hardest to never regress our users and to clearly communicate invasive
changes
