That's great information! Thanks :)
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 1:55 PM Justin wrote:
> We are using LXC in a medical device which has hard real time
> requirements. We use Yocto to build our embedded Linux distribution and
> have also used the RT_PREEMPT patch. We have had good results and the
Thanks for the information. I will also move to 20.04
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 3:12 PM Mark Paterson wrote:
> I don't have an LXC reason at present to choose one or the other. For
> robotics, the most common messaging and application framework is called
> ROS, and it marches forward in step with
I don't have an LXC reason at present to choose one or the other. For
robotics, the most common messaging and application framework is called
ROS, and it marches forward in step with Ubuntu LTS release. Choosing 20.04
allows us to choose the latest ROS version, which in this case has
advantages in
We are using LXC in a medical device which has hard real time requirements.
We use Yocto to build our embedded Linux distribution and have also used
the RT_PREEMPT patch. We have had good results and the only issues we have
seen were related to drivers that were fixed in upstream kernels. Once we
Is there any advantage on running 20.04 vs 18.04 with kernel 5.X?
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 2:39 PM Mark Paterson wrote:
> Based on some success using LXC as a development environment on my
> desktop, we're looking at using LXC containers to deploy software to our
> robotics platform. The
Based on some success using LXC as a development environment on my desktop,
we're looking at using LXC containers to deploy software to our robotics
platform. The deployment platform will be Ubuntu 18.04 or 20.04, running on
a custom kernel with the RT_PREEMPT patch applied, and probably using
