>Please note that if you are compiling from git, a lot of information at
>the above links have changed and may be erroneous! The link [1] from
>3-1/2 years ago is woefully out of date. I would not recommend
>following those instructions for builds from git.
Thank you, Michael, for pointing me
On Sat, 2014-09-06 at 16:13 +0400, Vit Ry wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Sep 2014 21:15:52 +0200
> J Bc wrote:
> > But when you install from repositories, it create an init.d script
> > than run, stop lxc...
> > is it necessary this script if you compile?
> You can run and stop lxc container without /etc/in
On Fri, 5 Sep 2014 21:15:52 +0200
J Bc wrote:
> But when you install from repositories, it create an init.d script
> than run, stop lxc...
> is it necessary this script if you compile?
You can run and stop lxc container without /etc/inid.d/ script (use
lxc-{start,create}).
It is necessary only
Yes. thank you Vit.
But when you install from repositories, it create an init.d script
than run, stop lxc...
is it necessary this script if you compile?
2014-09-05 7:56 GMT+02:00 Vit Ry :
> Did you read INSTALL file?
> I think *default* way, like
>
> git clone https://github.com/lxc/lxc.git
> cd l
Did you read INSTALL file?
I think *default* way, like
git clone https://github.com/lxc/lxc.git
cd lxc
./autogen.sh
./configure
make
sudo make install
would work fine.
On 30 August 2014 16:19:51 GMT+04:00, J Bc wrote:
>What do you think is the correct way to compile lxc in debian ...
--
Sent
What do you think is the correct way to compile lxc in debian wheezy? thanks.
___
lxc-users mailing list
lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
... looks like a b0rked kernel. Where did you get it? I would
recommend looking at
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v3.15-rc4-utopic/
Quoting CDR (vene...@gmail.com):
> Ubuntu server blows up with LXC, and I am using the very latest kernel, 3.14.2
>
>
> [ 3798.345926] WARNING: CP
I know exactly what is going on, or so I imagine.
The kernel goes into a crisis when you use a NAT like vibr0, but the
box is multi-homed.
The network inside the container does not work. You may ping the
default gateway, at the same host, but packets are never transferred
to the internet.
If there
On Thu, 2014-05-08 at 14:24 -0400, CDR wrote:
> The trace is showing it. Look for the word lxc-start
When you do that. Point it out. Highlight it in the message. You see
it but there's a lot of noise in the tracedump below. I couldn't spot
it and had to save the message as an mbox dump and do
Yes, preserving the existing OS is what the installer will do by default,
but if you choose manual partitioning from the installer menu, you can
arrange things precisely to your preferences.
J J
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 11:54 AM, CDR wrote:
> I did manage to update my system.
> I have a question
On 05/08/2014 08:54 PM, CDR wrote:
> I did manage to update my system.
> I have a question about Ubuntu that I have not been able to satisfy.
> Where is, traditionally, the forum or support source that knows
> everything about Ubuntu?
ubuntuforums.org
t
I did manage to update my system.
I have a question about Ubuntu that I have not been able to satisfy.
Where is, traditionally, the forum or support source that knows
everything about Ubuntu?
My question is: When I installed my server LTS 14.04, there was an
existing old OS there. The installer di
On 05/08/2014 08:28 PM, CDR wrote:
> Dear Thomas
> I got this error on "apt-get update"
>
> Reading package lists... Done
> W: GPG error: http://ppa.launchpad.net trusty Release: The following
> signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not
> available: NO_PUBKEY D5495F657635B973
>
On 05/08/2014 08:24 PM, CDR wrote:
> The trace is showing it. Look for the word lxc-start
>
Indeed. Well, it works for me.
tamas
___
lxc-users mailing list
lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
Dear Thomas
I got this error on "apt-get update"
Reading package lists... Done
W: GPG error: http://ppa.launchpad.net trusty Release: The following
signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not
available: NO_PUBKEY D5495F657635B973
Philip
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 2:24 PM, CDR wrot
The trace is showing it. Look for the word lxc-start
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Tamas Papp wrote:
>
> On 05/08/2014 08:06 PM, CDR wrote:
>> Ubuntu server blows up with LXC, and I am using the very latest kernel,
>> 3.14.2
>>
>>
>> [ 3798.345926] WARNING: CPU: 11 PID: 6963 at
>> /home/apw/CO
On 05/08/2014 08:06 PM, CDR wrote:
> Ubuntu server blows up with LXC, and I am using the very latest kernel, 3.14.2
>
>
> [ 3798.345926] WARNING: CPU: 11 PID: 6963 at
> /home/apw/COD/linux/fs/sysfs/dir.c:52 sysfs_warn_dup+0x91/0xb0()
> [ 3798.345928] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename
> '/dev
Ubuntu server blows up with LXC, and I am using the very latest kernel, 3.14.2
[ 3798.345926] WARNING: CPU: 11 PID: 6963 at
/home/apw/COD/linux/fs/sysfs/dir.c:52 sysfs_warn_dup+0x91/0xb0()
[ 3798.345928] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename
'/devices/pci:00/:00:05.0/:02:00.1/net/et
On 05/08/2014 06:20 PM, CDR wrote:
> Dear Friends
> Don´t know if it makes sense to do this. I just decided to try Ubuntu
> Server LTS, and wish to compile the latest LXC version, not from git.
> In Fedora I typed "make rpm". What would be the steps to compile and
> install the very latest version
Dear Friends
Don´t know if it makes sense to do this. I just decided to try Ubuntu
Server LTS, and wish to compile the latest LXC version, not from git.
In Fedora I typed "make rpm". What would be the steps to compile and
install the very latest version of LXC in Ubuntu?
Yours
Philip
_
20 matches
Mail list logo
