Hello,
I typically start my containers with something like:
sudo lxc-start -F -n xenial-dev -f /images/lxc/xenial-dev.conf
With 2.0.6, I get the error 'Error: container xenial-dev is not defined'
Going back to 2.0.5 solves the problem.
Using lxc-create also solves the problem, but I want to avoi
That looks like
commit 359467743d707d08fda029fa6e957a93bc8dc7ef
Author: Christian Brauner
Date: Fri Oct 14 15:27:24 2016 +0200
tools: better error reporting for lxc-start
which added a check for "!c->is_defined(c)"
Christian?
-serge
Quoting Detlef Vollmann (d...@vollmann.ch):
> Hello,
Hm, works for me. I can just start containers fine where the
configuration file is located somewhere else. Can you please
append/copy the containers configuration file here and note any
special tweaks to your setup as well?
On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 8:46 PM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> That looks like
On 01/01/17 14:14, Christian Brauner wrote:
> Hm, works for me. I can just start containers fine where the
> configuration file is located somewhere else. Can you please
> append/copy the containers configuration file here and note any
> special tweaks to your setup as well?
Here's my test case:
$
Hi,
Thanks for the info. I'm a little confused.
On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 01:31:28PM +0100, Detlef Vollmann wrote:
> On 01/01/17 14:14, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > Hm, works for me. I can just start containers fine where the
> > configuration file is located somewhere else. Can you please
> > appe
Hi Christian,
thank you for replying!
On 01/09/17 17:35, Christian Brauner wrote:
> Thanks for the info. I'm a little confused.
Sorry about that. But maybe it's because we talk about
different things.
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 01:31:28PM +0100, Detlef Vollmann wrote:
>> On 01/01/17 14:14, Chris
Hi Detlef,
Now we're getting somewhere. :)
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 03:59:21PM +0100, Detlef Vollmann wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> thank you for replying!
>
> On 01/09/17 17:35, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > Thanks for the info. I'm a little confused.
> Sorry about that. But maybe it's because we
Hi Detlef,
I sent a branch against lxc (https://github.com/lxc/lxc/pull/1381) which removes
the c->is_defined(c) check.
Thanks!
Christian
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 04:10:53PM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
> Hi Detlef,
>
> Now we're getting somewhere. :)
>
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 03:59:21PM +
On 01/11/17 16:24, Christian Brauner wrote:
> I sent a branch against lxc (https://github.com/lxc/lxc/pull/1381) which
> removes
> the c->is_defined(c) check.
Thanks a lot!
I'll don't test it right now (sorry, just too lazy to compile it
myself), but I'm sure I'll get it pretty soon via the PPA,
