[lxc-users] lxc.network.type = phys (or nothing...)

2014-10-07 Thread Joris Michaux
Hi all, Fisrt mail here for a french sysadmin. *Context : * - 1 Debian 7 with 3 interfaces : |_ eth0 = 10.170.2.189 |_ eth1 = 10.170.2.187 |_ eth2 = 10.170.2.185 - Role : hosting 2 containers LXC with an Apache within - Networking configuration : lxc.network.type = phys Working on 6 hosts

Re: [lxc-users] lxc.network.type = phys (or nothing...)

2014-10-07 Thread Jäkel , Guido
Dear Joris, >I've compared all configurations, nothing has changed... When I rollback my >host with the last full backup, all goes OK... but >it's the third time it re appears... Sorry, but that's illogical: If it reproducible work with some backup-image but not with the current one despite of

Re: [lxc-users] lxc.network.type = phys (or nothing...)

2014-10-08 Thread Joris Michaux
2014-10-07 13:46 GMT+02:00 Jäkel, Guido : > Dear Joris, > Hi, > > >I've compared all configurations, nothing has changed... When I rollback > my host with the last full backup, all goes OK... but > >it's the third time it re appears... > > Sorry, but that's illogical: If it reproducible work wi

Re: [lxc-users] lxc.network.type = phys (or nothing...)

2014-10-08 Thread Jäkel , Guido
Dear Joris, >>BTW: I hate "solutions by counter questions". Therefore, it should not be a >>solution but just a question of interest >>why the physical reach-through of interfaces is your preferred solution. > >Because my hosts are virtuals, and it's very easy to me to provide them 3 >interfaces